How to get on with Saving American Democracy
YouTube is a great repository of video testimony and facts, with no card catalog so we use links in our pages to make the point with nuetrality Be prepared to click the "skip ad" button in lower right corner - we don't control how youtube launchs links Firefox Android using UBlock Origin will automatically currently block the ads and turn the url into "m.youtube . . ." Sadly meaningful lengthy comments on Youtube seem to disappear.
Only ONE member need file this resolution which will force the Section 3 vote and put people on record. See https://tinyurl.com/4bjvxkbk even if they don't bring it to the floor, THEN Trump is formally disqualified.
In any of these Trump administration cases any Federal Judge could declare the subject matter before them is a Section 3 of the 14th amendment rebellion by whomever is in the jurisdiction before them as a violation and distill it to an order that casts it to Congress for a mandatory Amnesty vote by the final jurisdictional statement sentence of Section 3 of the 14th amendment. Also any attorney in the case or by intervention could argue the same. George Conway keeps arguing everything Trump is doing is illegal and unconstitutional. This would force Congress to vote to remove any federal officer or justice who engages in disqualifying activity against the Constitution of the United States and Congressional laws by rebellion. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bi25VIQcbN8 and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxiNgPsVKGc
Stop protesting and start insisting your members of Congress file Section 3 of the 14th amendment resolution prosecutions against Trump administration officials. The format shown works by changing the facts to tsylor the rebellion information against ANYONE whether in office or not so long as they have sworn ANY oath EVER to support and defend the Constitution. Mary Trump does a "boo hoo" piece on a "proud boy" not pardoned but only commuted . See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mzvKLj9snM
Only two months into the Trump administration many if not most all officials are in enough open rebellion to the Constitution of the United States and Congressional laws that Section 3 of the 14th amendment issue resolutions can be filed against most of the administration to remove and bar them from office anywhere ever again.. Remember, the SCOTUS has no power to review those unless the allegations are not constitutionally rebellious or not violation of Congressional laws with proof. That is what Trump v Anderson 23-719 ruling March 4 2024 says.
Even Laura Ingraham is looking like she thinks Trump has lost reality, and is aka "crazy". See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VgTJr4W0lo. It only takes a MINORITY against hard and fast rebellious conduct to clean "house". Insist your Congressional members begin to do so. Only they have the power. Also a Petition in Mandamus could be filed in a federal district court requiring they do so against allegations and proof you present. Everyone of these Trump officials are violating the Preamble axiom of "justice, domestic tranquility and to form a more perfect union" and 18 USC 241 in addition to any more specific violations of Congressional laws that apply to the case of their conduct.
Stop protesting and take action that will do something actually the SCOTUS calls "private legislation" Make the Democrats pull their head out of their rears or fears and do their jobs.
Most people know 80 year old people are slow and think about their historic experiences. Old Lawyers and politicians know the law,, while old failures develop Delusions of grandure. Trump is the second one. People try to rationalize Trump but the truth is he has always been a dim wit and trying to make his nonsense relevant. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7goMhEQt9U
Mr. Trump is simply destroying American military sales and his tariffs will end even and especially the F35 program and sales. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyrtVuxk94A
Senator Chris Murphy delivered a floor presentation on the myriad of ways Trump has been corrupt and violated the oath of office in only six weeks. It could and should be turned into a formal Section 3 of the 14th amendment prosecution like the sample resolution here and filed to force an Amnesty vote. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hycoCYenXls&t=260s
Enough with the speeches and media appearances to whine to the American people. Members of Congress ONLY have the power to file a Section 3 of the 14th amendment prosecution vote by resolution describing all this. That is is the method by Congressional action to remove any person who has sworn an oath to the Constitution of the United States and Congressional laws and then acts in rebellion to the Constitution.
Even Mr. Musk took an oath for naturalized citizenship. The idiots in charge. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3ZQ6ioTT6I
Democrats need to learn how to prosecute Section 3 of the 14th amendment. It applies to ANYONE who has taken an oath to the Constitution of the United States and Congressional laws and then rebells against the Constitution of the United States and Congressional laws. Forget impeachment. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfubBag5nWU and how Tesla and Musk crumbling. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRq_ksfzoHA
David Feldman has sobered up factually reporting on what the government is staffed with all religious zealot racists in actuality who simply are God Delusional. March 27, 2025 See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEKGrkcqlfU and March 29, 2025 see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0M_EFtwIwR4 as actually their allowance in the US Government is unconstitutional in and of itself, violation of the 1st Amendment and separation of church and state they take an oath the do. It too is a rebellion to the Constitution of the United States and Congressional laws as a Section 3 of the 14th amendment issue and violation. You can only blame the the Dumbocrats for not knowing how to prosecute Section 3 of the 14th amendment.
Chris Hayes despite being told how the shutdown would be worse https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJDHET0MAz8&t=210s he later does an emotional idiot's piece about hard working people and protests planned etc when he won't feel any of the outcome of a shutdown. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZk4hhSPMG0
The strategy is to live to fight on not cripple everyone on principle. Now Congress can be pushed to file the resolution and more like it. The protests will do nothing without a legal focus.
These Senators voted to advance the the Republican CR to avert a government shutdown March 14th 2025 at midnight.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer
Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania
Senator Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada
Senator Brian Schatz of Hawaii
Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois
Senator Kirsten Gillibrand of New York
Senator Gary Peters of Michigan
Senator Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire
Senator Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire
Senator Angus King of Maine, an independent who frequently caucuses with Democrats
"There is no off-ramp," for a government shutdown, Schumer told the New York Times. "The off-ramp is in the hands of Donald Trump and Elon Musk and DOGE. We could be in a shutdown for six months or nine months."
This is what America does not understand. The alternative is worse. But the issue goes back to January 6, 2025 when the Democrats could have kept Trump out of office. Now they are in a Chinese finger trap. The way out is not protests and a lot of talk but filing the resolution to call for the Amnesty vote. What did they think a Trump administration would do??? Direct the angst to Congress Democrats.
Only Fetterman and Shaheen are not Lawyers. This is the wisdom of a legal education to know when you are trapped both ways, so they did the right thing absent emotion everyone else has.
David Feldman March 15, 2025 explains in detail the CR and budget bill issues in full at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJp6jBhjGBs
It is all coming apart. Now if Congress would file the resolution to remove Trump. Why don't we do mental examinations like the military requires, on government officials. Here is Mary Trump March 10, 2025 at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Geoqs9q0fA
If you really want to understand the issue before Mr Trump's presidency it is the 10 trillion in interest coming due on the National Debt in 2025 while knucklehead Trump is trying to give a tax cut. I think Harris really did not want the job and here is a detailed explanation of why. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igSJlA0FBJM&t=920s
Is this what Trump is trying to do??? - Ezra Klien and Gillian Tett is a columnist at The Financial Times and a member of its editorial board. She’s also a trained anthropologist with a Ph.D. And she brings both perspectives into this conversation — exploring Trump’s policies as economics, as well as power politics, patronage and cultural messaging — which I think makes the whole thing make a bit more sense. So.... : Is Trump ‘Detoxing’ the Economy or Poisoning It? | Jessica Denson is no Ezra Klien!!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PXVrLH4zSU
Jake Broe on Ukraine and Russia March 11, 2025 is not good for Trump, Musk or Russia. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1611Pdt9Lak and Lawrence O'Donnell on how stupid all of the Trump administration is becoming. He in essence says the 25th Amendment applies. We'll of course, it applied before Trump took office. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfLbZ3poDVk and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n804BwrNwQo as though Trump's mental illness showing was not all over the campaign and told others as a warning like from Dr. Bandy X Lee. ( bandylee.com )
Jamie Raskin took his limpy show onto social media with receptionist turned legal show host Brian Tyler Cohen after DOGE was declared a Federal Agency with a Freedom of Information Act Request. Wow, how threatening is that??? See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBCnMsjt_BQ and then appears on the the Bozo Democracy Docket YouTube channel show with Marc Elias with much the same speech. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYnN9hqmGN4
Of the three ways to Remove officials including the Presidency and Supreme Court members, being impeachment, 25th Amendment for the Presidency and Section 3 of the 14th amendment, only the last one can be launched by one member of Congress using in essence a Constitutionally based Complaint of rebellion against the Constitution of the United States and Congressional laws.
Raskin knows that the Congress has screwed up royally, and all his tangential attacks show stupidity, weakness and fear. Many members of Congress have been faxed the first two pages and link address to the resolution.
Chris Hayes points out now is time to "try something" to remove Trump. Trump has no law degree nor legal education nor does Musk, so what are these two doing at the top of the American government legal system?? Raskin does have a Law Degree AND license to practice but cannot mount a strong prosecution under the very simple and powerful Section 3 of the 14th amendment because it would work.
It will take a court order in Mandamus to make any member of Congress to support and defend the Constitution and do their job according to to their oath of office and duty to the Constitution and Country by filing the resolution or many like it to clean the government of the insurrectionists.
Mr Trump's executive order to attack two major law firms because they represented efforts against Trump not only is retaliation, it is illegal under 18 USC 241 attempting to "injure, oppress, threaten and intimidate" others and is thus a rebellion to the Congressional law. A clear Section 3 of the 14th amendment violation by his own hand in the public record in writing no less. Raskin needs to stop whining and complain about the absurdity of everything and draft and file a Section 3 of the 14th amendment prosecution resolution. Stop telling the American people what Trump and his administration is doing and do what only a member of Congress can do and take action to enforce the bar to office
Impeachment is a fool's errand. The votes are not there to succeed and it leaves the Trump administration in place with Vance as president. Additionally Trump's issues are not "high crimes and misdemeanors", they are rebellion to the Constitution of the United States and Congressional laws which are summarily addressed under Section 3 of the 14th amendment by vote after establishing they occurred as the resolution shows in detail. It is quick and only a court review would ensue IF Trump claims something averred is not a rebellion to the Constitution of the United States and Congressional laws. Not likely to be overcome because there are so many. This route removes the entire administration and all appointments. It would elevate Harris/Walz to power., and restore all agency firings and actions as illegitimate under Trump.
These two videos sum up the general issue after the state of the union speech. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxcdRSBS_V8 and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arHHAfYbM-M
This is why is time to remove Trump from office he holds illegitimately "Cut ties with the abuser" and this page shows how to Constitionally do this.
When will YouTube creators stop reporting, and start promoting the solution?? But the real problem is electing Congressional representatives and other government officials who are supposed to enforce the law who are not Lawyers nor legally trained. They are sit there befuddled because are not educated to think legally.
AL Green of Texas vocally protested Trump's lies to the Nation in his "State of the union speech. Chris Hayes did a segment titled " Try something" to stop Trump. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWkTOEZENp8 and the next day the Republicans censured Green and 10 Democrats joined the Censure Resolution. The thing to "try" is the resolution on the page.
The 10 Democrats who voted with Republicans to censure Green were: Ami Bera of California, Ed Case of Hawaii, Jim Costa of California, Laura Gillen of New York, Jim Himes of Connecticut, Chrissy Houlahan of Pennsylvania, Marcy Kaptur of Ohio, Jared Moskowitz of Florida, Marie Gluesenkamp Perez of Washington and Tom Suozzi of New York.
“I don’t mind being one of 10 Democrats who said, no, there’s a deeper principle at stake here, which is reverence for this institution,” Himes said after the vote, adding that lawmakers need to act “with the decorum and with the civility that says to the world that we are a serious country.”
“I have no love for Donald Trump, but I do have reverence for the Office of the President,” he told CNN’s Pamela Brown.
But that is Delusional thinking because Trump is not the Constitutionally proper president because Congress skipped the step of clearing Trump's Constitutionally ineligible candidate status. These are "DINO's". You cannot talk about reverence of the office of the Presidency and have a person in Mr Trump who in Constitutionally rebellious acts violate" justice, domestic tranquility and to form a more perfect union " and the law. George Conway is bent out of shape the Democrats are cowards. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLG6FtGn3yk These Democrats are sick in the head and literally cannot think straight, or are so scared they too are literally "kissing the ring" by proxy.
Mr Trump and Vance has shown February 28, 2025 by way of ambush of President Zelensky who they really are https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcHsEJne1NU and then Congressman AL Green spoke out claiming that impeachment is now called for at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRjdlct5zQA but he like many do not read the Constitution. The better way is to enforce Section 3 of the 14th amendment as this page shows how can quickly be done in as little two days.
The truth is Ukraine is winning the war more than Trump wants to admit, though it appears he knows Russia is about to collapse again. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRlbYlbsfrY as the truth is Ukraine is where all of Russia had its intelligence in people, which why Ukraine is so effective. Putin is trying to steal the Ukrainian brains back to Russia.
It doesn't appear Russia can afford the Ukraine war much longer. Who is dying by the droves are Russian soldiers. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bU3xcIvlOjw
Here is the official MSNBC show on the issue audio only Lawrence O'Donnell show by Johnathan Caphart at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wm9YyqbZiGY and here is a third party video post of the same show. Be advised these third party shows are often forced to be taken down or simply disappear. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjhW4i6vsmY
It must be noted that this Resolution removal method is Constitutionally proper on ANY Federal Officer including CLEAR transgressions of the Constitution in rebellion to the Constitution of the United States including Supreme Court Justices. It is no wonder Justice Robert's wrote a "statecraft" order intentionally hard to decipher and follow because they too can be removed by Section 3 of the 14th amendment "private legislation" also upon a CLEAR constitution rebellion via an order they may quietly veil in law
Brooks and Caphart on PBS on the Trump ambush of President Zelensky https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19r63QYAvZA and Adam Schiff weighs in, but Democrats are real rich with any indignation because they put Trump there and allow him to stay https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-onI385ehD8 but Chris Hayes points out Trump lost it because Zelensky was trashing Putin https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZThLlfMvMRY MSNBC highlights on the matter https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjAsMDUZ6rU meanwhile Walmart is warning the economy is about to fall apart and old man Trump has not got a clue. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CWAyov87r0. Frankly anyone who works with the elderly can tell you this is how 80 year Olds are likely to behave. But Trump is particularly bad as this is his everyday behavior.
DONATE to help get it done. Or donate anonymously at https://gofund.me/13069fce
Three step process
1. Finish the National Popular Vote Effort Compact into law, finishing by State Constitution initiatives on the ballot in Florida, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio and, Arizona and maybe Oklahoma and Nevada too.
2. Remove actors by Quo Warranto or Resolution by Section 3 immediately when they wander
3. Put age limits of 65 on all elected offices and government officers of the courts that is as easy as changing the oath of office that they agree to retire at their 65th birthday in order to receive retirement benefits and that their office will invalidate as to them at that time .
Bernie Sanders holds Oligarchy rally in Nebraska on February 21, 2025 See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BiXs6OYBM0U
Elon Musk violates 18 USC 1752 and 208 and Lawrence O'Donnell lays the truth bare at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oK_dTxqfmrI
Project 2025 history all the way back Reagan https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPbzl9J37-U and just replace "MAGA" with "Racist" for an accurate synopsis of the real problem in America. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyleOTPeEHs
Rachel Maddow goes over the myriad of ways Trump's approval rating keeps heading into the negative areas along with all the Trump administration. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2CUFX9kUkM. Trump then get belligerent with Governors as Nicole Wallace reports February 21, 2025 but the real story is how soft the media - both social and corporate report on this without detailing how Congress should be about removing Trump in his mental health issues and general stupidity. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2CUFX9kUkM and of course Trump fires the African American joint chiefs of staff. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHwVpP1hiPY when obviously it is not the job of the Presidency to destroy the government but to work to attain "justice, domestic tranquility and to form a more perfect union". The "Constitutional crisis" is Congress failing to protect the government structure and institutions and Constitution.
The Republican mantra is to "conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State," and has been this way since reconstruction, and more blatantly so beginning with the Reagan presidency. ( 18 USC 241) Now much time is spent whining and complain about the absurdity of everything incoming with Trump in a second presidency. See for example https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxUMz52ckSM
This makes the Republican position un-American, unconstitutional and unlawful. An absolute violation of Section 3 of the 14th amendment.
Section 3 of the 14th amendment is the "police department" amendment for the government to use to remove or prevent rebellious or insurrectionist parties from being in government. There are two ways to use it. Through the Congress by the Congressional members directly by "private legislation" as the Supreme Court calls it, or Judicially through Quo Warranto under DC Code 16-3501 for Federal Officers and personnel. In both cases the only appeal is to Congress under the final sentence of Section 3. The Supreme Court said so.
The Constitution when conceived never contemplated "parties" and thus the two party "tribal" mindless mentally of following a single leader we see today. In fact Section 3 of the 14th amendment was an attempt to Constitutionalize power to the terms and duties it bestoees upon American citizens. Lawrence Tribe explains how and why it was written to be a self executing section that did not depend on nor give power to the courts. See why it does not belong in Court systems and goes direct to Congress after the determination is made at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5E_3uhVy08&t=3240s and this was September 12, 2023, which echoes what happened in the election.
People got hung up on "insurrection", when what went on by Trump was "rebellion" to the Constitution of the United States and Congressional laws. The proposed resolution is one which enforces the Constitution. Democracy is non existant without the National contract that is the Constitution it MUST operate under which everyone calls collectively "the rule of law". Listen and watch Lawrence Tribe in his prophetic summary. Then see how Rachel Maddow show how citizens do not want the person at the top Mr. Trump from Republicans. Without the two party system this would never be if people independently use the intelligence to select a leader. Lying is "unconstitutional" and if we had learned to enforce that maybe Trump would not have risen again. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pu1nW1pygts
It looks like this that only ONE member need file this resolution which will force the Section 3 vote and put people on record. See https://tinyurl.com/4bjvxkbk even if they don't bring it to the floor, THEN Trump is formally disqualified.
Even this sample resolution is not up to date as so many more Section 3 of the 14th amendment and Congressional laws have been violated since by "King" Trump according to to his Time magazine rendering. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQZy3k83Q-w Remember Presidential immunity does not cover Constitutional violations Congress may prosecute.
Voter suppression stole the election. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3PM15wCVn0
Where voter suppression was heavily used, also vote tampering is statistically evident. Given Trump was constitutionally ineligible, so Congressional Democrats are the lax constitutional enforcers according to their oaths. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWSWqn7UHYM
We are getting closer to Congressional Democrats finally understanding it is time to Prosecute Section 3 of the 14th amendment. They may finally realize that Section is the minority power to eject from office rebellious government officials and all it will take is filing proof of fact resolutions like found on this page. The Constitution is the "HR" mechanism for Section 3 of the 14th amendment and it has no "statute of limitation" as the SCOTUS has also said. Government officials cannot run from their past. Meidas Touch and Ben Meicelas has become a sad "tattle tale" operation with no plan but increase subscribers for ad dollars. Now it is promoting Trump style dog whistling for violence because they have no Constitutional understanding how to end this. Here is a mash up video that does not promote a solution only the problem. He closes saying he is ready for a fight. No fight is needed, simply educating Congress to their minority power. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4fP6-v8voY and the proper way to stop Trump at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1K61aMsfLyI
One must READ very carefully the Trump v Anderson 23-719 ruling March 4 2024 to understand this. States may use Section 3 against their own personnel but not against Federal candidates or personnel. It is self executing in that the conduct and then proof of same activates the bar to office.. It should be noted that once determined by a state entity against a state official, that party cannot hold federal office either, but a state cannot find a federal government candidate barred from federal office, only Congress or the DC District federal court under DC Code 16-3501 can. This is what the ruling defines.
With that said, "private legislation" is simply a resolution naming the party, their conduct, the Article, Section and Clause or Amendment and Section and or Congressional law rebelliously violated, the proof of same by public record and the filing of said resolution and call for a vote to excuse such conduct or not. It takes a 2/3 vote in both houses to remove this disability or the person must vacate the office and is "fired" by the Constitution itself.
There was a point in the Trump v Anderson 23-719 oral argument where Justice Roberts asked Jason Murray to explain how Section 3 works and his lack of answer sealed the ruling of the case. This above is how it is meant to work, absent the need for judicial involvement.
Here now today any member may levy Section 3 of the 14th amendment claims upon any person as "private legislation" who has taken an oath of office as outlined above to cause their removal unless a court later rules the claims do not fit a violation of Congressional laws or the Constitution. It should be noted that much like a Censure Resolution the added Section 3 claims will eject a member summarily from Congress also.
Frankly, a violation of the Preamble as to "justice, domestic tranquility and to form a more perfect union" could do so also. The Republicans entire platform violates the Preamble of the Constitution and 18 USC 241 so the "leverage" the Democrats have as the minority is Section 3 of the 14th amendment completely to self police the Congress and Government to "un-confirm" parties ad nauseum.
This is how bad it is that a Republican Senator cautions nominees they better never think they can ignore a court order. Obviously that is a Section 3 of the 14th amendment violation. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RR-mJmyaRg and while most people do not realize copper kills all viruses - including Ebola - still the Trump administration is playing with medical fire for America. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mk9igZMaER4 But most importantly February 28, 2025 Lawrence O'Donnell shows the dementia dance that is Trump. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fiEYVJi7LzU
Tesla down, Trump golfing, UK bans Cyber truck. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Je64iNiPzQk and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEtspjb-mZA
Elizabeth Warren is talking about Musk, but again no plan. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-0lIrmgy90
This entire administration is a rebellion to the Constitution. Congress could grow a pair and vote on it under Section 3 of the 14th amendment
The Dumbocrats could have prevented this Constitutionally ineligible candidate to hold office on January 6 2025.
Trump by Musk & crew violates 18 USC 208 Leverage is filing this resolution that will force a Section 3 vote and put people on record. Stop talking about this ad nauseum and take action. Tell Congress to stop with the speeches and grow a pair and enforce the Constitutional ineligible candidate provisio and eject Trump from office plain, simple and easy
Here Gina Bonanno details some Valentines Day presents the Trump administration has levied on its own once supporters who Trump loves as the uneducated. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6GBGwaH-ag
Sadly the Democrats are the Dumbocrats because the solution is as simple as above to remove Trump and end this national nightmare, and the Social and Corporate media YouTube and other content creators are just as much the problem by reporting like myna birds and offering no solution or even hint at a solution of laws being violated that should be enforced. They are clueless to the law as are most Americans. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1K61aMsfLyI
Today's world is full of social media mouths and no intelligence or action. Sad but true as people are quick to "engage" spouting a "comment" often off base, meaningless or just speaking into the ether of nothingness. The Democrats are the Dumbocrats" video makes this point, as social media is a collection of click cults where people blindly defend their influencer leader. Such a person often spouts a meaningless parroting or echo chamber with no solution in simple meaningless protest and people think they are doing something. This has also infected the Congress. Speeches ad nauseum like the people have power to do something when it is they that have the power.
All forms of media are full of the parroting myna bird reporting as everyone wants to be a social media influencer recognized by name or handle and this is the "likes" and "subscribers" mantra which makes money through shared advertising revenue, when the reality is most of it is just noise. When a problem like Trump happens it creates a "chicken little" effect and people start mentally running in circles. People lack critical thinking or action beyong protesting in the streets with a sign perhaps. This page presents a solution under the law.
Trump has been sworn in in violation of the Constitution. People want to stop this but Congress is gutless. Congress can stop this by a revisit by a simple resolution citing Trump being disqualified under the 14th amendment in accord Trump v Anderson 23-719 ruling March 4 2024 at page 8 referring to footnote 2 and bottom of page 10 top of 11 where the Supreme Court describes how Section 3 of the 14th amendment bar to office on conduct and nothing more activates. Everything Trump is about to do is illegitimate as well as unconstitutional violating 18 USC 241 and the Preamble of the Constitution. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLNya8fevqI for example.
Trump is headed for his third impeachment articles but there is a better Constitutional removal path https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Mk6DsmRWCc
There needs to be a push upon Congress for ONE member to file this resolution which will force the Section 3 vote and put people on record. See https://tinyurl.com/4bjvxkbk even if they don't bring it to the floor, THEN Trump is formally disqualified.
George Conway with Sarah Longwell at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjqSeb9GyeI is stuck on Impeachment as the only way to get rid of Trump. He is wrong. A simple read of Trump v Anderson 23-719 ruling March 4 2024 at page 8 referring to footnote 2 reflects how that Congress may at "any time" enforce Section 3 of the 14th amendment because Trump is in full blown "rebellion" to the Constitution of the United States and Congressional laws as George himself says. . The objection further down in the page shows at least 20 violations of Section 3 of the 14th amendment all constitutionally disqualifying activity. It is Congress that must grow a pair to save the Country.
There are three ways to Remove officials including the Presidency. Section 3 of the 14th amendment by use of it in Congress, through Quo Warranto under DC Code 16-3501 to force an "appeal" Amnesty vote following judicial order, and of course impeachment
At the very least Mr Trump has indicated he is unable to faithfully discharge the office of the Presidency as it requires to see to a faithful execution of the laws and to act to promote "justice, domestic tranquility and to form a more perfect union" all of which Trump has done the opposite. The American Bar Association has gone on record saying Trump is attacking the rule of law. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1qwCJocbTM Trump in his effort with Musk is to gas light the country to believe there is enough savings from fraud to pay for extending the wealthy parties tax cut. Leeja Miller did a salty mouth deep dive into Musk's Information Technology Minions at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sfrp3hyFBjY and given the Whitehouse press conference with Elon Musk leading it, where absolutely no proof was presented it is beyond obvious Musk is an "idiot savant" who has no place in government at this higher echelon and not especially in politics as he breaks law claiming to make discoveries. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIsP1KkSZmM
This is a violation of 18 USC 1752 for Musk and his people as DOGE is not a lawfully created government entity, and Trump's involvement is another Section 3 of the 14th amendment violation and breach of his oath of office.
Jessica Denson posted on January 23, 2025 a video on how Trump remains Constitutionally ineligible to hold office, not yet disqualified because that happens by the required amnesty vote by the final sentence of Section 3 of the 14th amendment. She gets that distinction wrong. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkliqhxM2XY
Jessica Denson is an ex Trump staffer who was gullible to Trump's lies, now a lone voice in the wilderness still trying to ride the Trump is disqualified mantra based on Section 3 of the 14th amendment. She declares Trump is an " illegally sworn in, illegitimate President" . Denson is not a Lawyer nor has been trainrled in or worked in law. Sadly she is 100% wrong. Trump is a lawfully sworn in constitutionally ineligible to hold office ever again unless Congress relieves the disability. Until and unless Congress acts that ineligible status is moot.
Only the age, 14 year resident requirement and natural born requirement are hard constitutionally eligibility factors, while the Section 3 bar to office is a contingent ineligible candidate factor depending on Congressional action though self executing - for enforcement. Because Denson cannot seem to comprehend this her efforts are choas and largely null.
Instead of educating herself she threatens, much like Trump, anyone who speaks the truth of her short comings. Denson is an internet YouTube content creator whose videos drag hurting people off on an improper belief tangent because she misunderstands the operation and terminology of the law. She means well but is simply wrong in how she believes and has been possibly told Section 3 of the 14th amendment works. She means well but read on
How one knows Denson is off message in the law is a read of the Trump v Anderson 23-719 ruling. The SCOTUS defines Trump is NOT disqualified until Congress votes to not excuse the (a) defined Section 3 conduct raised by Congress in "private legislation" - as in WHAT the proposed resolution on this page is - causing the bar to office disability. Lawyers improperly using a word does not make it valid. Right now Denson is NOT helping leading people astray of the proper operation and language of the law. The proper term is "constitutionally ineligible" until Congress takes up a disability vote
But it is understandable how a non legally educated person struggles with the nuances of law. A Section 3 Constitutional ineligibility must be summarily by facts defined in and as rebellion , or for insurrection Federally adjudicated. A citizen or state court cannot just declare it as Denson does waving her arms all about.
These YouTube creators are clueless chasing YouTube ad revenue and NOT seeking or promoting a solution their followers and subscribers can get under. They are an irritating mindless mouth sect doing a service to Trump by not pushing an organized solution.
Until people learn to think legally about this issue, talk is cheap and goes nowhere. In Brandenburg v. Ohio in 1969, SCOTUS limited the scope of banned speech to that directed to and likely to incite imminent lawless action (e.g. an IMMEDIATE riot). However broadcast of lies that does the same thing is also not protected free speech. This was a revisit to the "fire" in a crowded theater issue. If it does not promote "justice, domestic tranquility and to form a more perfect union" it is unconstitutional. Suit could be brought and FOX and others made to pay for their lies again.
Only the DC District federal court has jurisdiction to hear any pleading on Section 3 of the 14th amendment. See more of page in detail for how and why. There is pending litigation docketed only January 31 2025 Congress is who must be sued in mandamus as the suit does. Standby. Jessica Denson bless her is not an attorney and misunderstands a lot thus presenting misinformation unknowingly. See https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vAqhNxLTMtw and Trump is now the "legal" president having been declared the winner and then sworn in.
The "illegality" rests in Congress for counting votes "not regularly given" of a Constitutionally ineligible candidate. Congress can however by just one member still today and a simple resolution worded properly may show public facts and record with the order of March 4 2024 in Trump v Anderson 23-719 ruling by the Supreme Court show Trump is Constitutionally ineligible to hold office ever again unless Congress relieves the disability and thus demand the Amnesty vote of the final sentence of Section 3 of the 14th amendment be taken.
Upon refusal to allow the vote be brought by the leadership of either house makes it constitutionally a "NO" vote for all and THEN Trump is disqualified having then failed to reach the 2/3 majority of YES votes of both houses to clear him. The Supreme Court said Congress may raise the issue "at any time" even post election. The group of videos properly addressing the Section 3 of the 14th amendment issue has excerpts from the filed petition.
There are several videos properly addressing the Section 3 of the 14th amendment issue at on YouTube with numbers ScgtAVdUTyY and 76s9QCDVub8 and C30stwTsuyI and AeIOuEawNC4 They are actually legal proof videos.
Are we that dumb and stupid as a Nation to allow a criminal government??? Everyone reports, and acts like their hands are tied. Section 3 of the 14th amendment is not dead as so many convince themselves. It is more powerful than impeachment used properly. Let us wake up
Mr Trump has no interest in "justice, domestic tranquility and to form a more perfect union" but quite the opposite. Mr Trump remains constitutionally ineligible to hold office and his votes were unconstitutionally counted as not "regularly given" as no Amnesty vote was first taken per the SCOTUS
In Trump v Anderson 23-719, the SCOTUS defined the bar to office on conduct and nothing more in Trump's case by Article II Section I Clause I and his fake elector scheme in rebellion to the Constitution of the United States and Congressional laws. The SCOTUS defining the bar to office active upon him
With Trump barred from office, why did Congress count his votes without first taking the "private legislation" Amnesty vote?? This unconstitutionally certified Trump the winner directing Justice Roberts to swear Trump in. The Constitutional crisis is by the hand of Congress. Who will wake up???
Any member of Congress can use the resolution sample at https://tinyurl.com/4bjvxkbk to correct this Constitutional error according the SCOTUS at "any time". Why make speeches and go along with a Constitutionally illegitimate administration. Focusing on reversing this error will fix the issue to flush the Tump administration out of our government and restore the government to it's proper path. Do not report to and preach at the American people like they (we) can do anything to correct the error of Congress. See below for how with all the election interference and voter suppression Trump "won"
See how the 2024 was actually rigged with voter suppression at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LN65qFUDDo
Watch Donald Trump’s full inaugural address as the 47th president of the United States - YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGUHdOFUzDc which is the biggest load of crap probably ever uttered and he believes it all as good for America. Anthony Davis does the speech flashing "false" for every lie Trump spouts at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cISYOubP_6w and IHIP News at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awt4QUxTzMU
One American has shown how Trump can be stopped and removed from office without an impeachment because he is Constitutionally ineligible to hold office ever again unless Congress relieves the disability and is therefore illegitimate to hold office. Ryan Binkley in the Trump v Anderson 23-719 ruling March 4 2024 submitted an amicus brief the ruling followed as to logic mostly. See https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-719/295833/20240116172438239_AC%20Brief%20-%201-16-24.pdf
As the Binkley brief shows, a Constitutionally ineligible president can be ordered removed from office, but in this case the court would order Congress to perform the final sentence of Section 3 of the 14th amendment amnesty vote as the final sentence of Section 3 of the 14th amendment specifies as the appellate route. There is no further appeal to any court, because the ineligibility is based on the current invalidity of the votes as "not regularly given". Citizens simply need to raise funds for counsel to bring the action. It is a simple complaint based on the Trump v Anderson 23-719 ruling March 4 2024, which states by his conduct Trump brought the Constitutional ineligible status upon himself by his conduct as the bar to office automatically, and he did not ask to be relieved of the disability to hold office. Thus unless Congress relieves the disability by the required 2/3 vote in both houses, Trump and his administration must vacate.
See the Trump v Anderson 23-719 ruling March 4 2024 at page 8 referring to footnote 2 and page 10 at the bottom and top of 11 where the court describes it is Trump's conduct which activated the bar to office on conduct and nothing more meaning Trump remains Constitutionally ineligible to hold office ever again unless Congress relieves the disability. They did not. Thus Quo Warranto can be used to force the Section 3 of the 14th amendment vote due the bar to office. The ruling is at https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-719_19m2.pdf
Congress is both clueless and scared to do what the Constitution requires. Jamie Raskin, the Constitutional Law Professor is particularly clueless or faking it in deflection.
Democrats have realized AL Capone in the Whitehouse and has no intention of following his oath of office. What did they think would happen as Trump promised in the " peaceful transfer of power" BS. Truly how dumb are they??? See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8b_GRH_7kQo and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-zLhQ0zoBI
The Democrats had a clear shot on January 6 2025 and cowardly sat silent. Screw their speeches now in shame.
Kyle Kulinski finally calls the Democrats feckless and slow January 29, 2025 at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6KP_gvGL-Ww
How Trump has just started a very non presidential royal mess. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Y2q0tSu3Sw
Here Ben Meicelas reports on Anthony Scaramucci proposing the 25th Amendement at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjZhqvi6L9E
The 25th Amendement will not work and would leave JD Vance president and the administration otherwise in place.
The proper thing is Section 3 of the 14th amendment because the amnesty vote was never taken and Trump is not the legitimate president, and all of Trump's psychosis can be framed in rebellion to the Constitution of the United States and Congressional laws.
Why is it no one can seem to understand the law as it relates to the Constitution??
The Supreme Court said that Section 3 of the 14th amendment activates on conduct and nothing more.
That means the Trump administration is violating both the Preamble and 18 USC 241 as to the entire Nation as to "justice, domestic tranquility and to form a more perfect union"
That is a rebellion to the Constitution of the United States and Congressional laws.
Talk without reference to the law is meaningless. Meicelas has not got a clue what he is talking about. He ran Jessica Denson of the Meidas Touch network when she was correct but legally askew just a bit. Congress could act at "any time" on Section 3 of the 14th amendment says the Supreme Court. Congress and the Democrats are the problem.
Identify the problem and then propose a solution. The Democrats need to do their jobs to support and defend the Constitution. They are all gutless and afraid and want that $175,000 per year to do nothing
The entire Trump administration is operating illegally, and the only thing that can stop them is Congress through Section 3 of the 14th amendment because it violates generally the Preamble as to "justice, domestic tranquility and to form a more perfect union" and 18 USC 241 to "injure, oppress, threaten and intimidate" in a very real sense politically and actually physically. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BIOaxR_UHIQ
This is why no one who is not a licensed attorney should be able to run for or occupy Congressional seats or the Whitehouse who cannot faithfully execute the laws because they do not understand the law
Meanwhile Trump fills his administration with people the voters have rejected. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3i0d3ZsCjw
Democrats need to shut up acting like they are helping Americans as everyone of them have violated their oaths of office and duty to the Constitution.
The Democrats could have stopped all this on January 6 by stopping Trump from taking office, but they had no plan B when Harris lost
But the Democrats can still bring the Amnesty vote to disqualify and force Trump and his administration from office as he is an illegitimate president who remains Constitutionally ineligible to hold office.
For instance Representative Balint who is not a Lawyer filed a simple Censure Resolution against Margarie Taylor Greene here at https://balint.house.gov/uploadedfiles/finalbalint_014_xml45_copy.pdf in late 2023. Local copy at https://sadpac.com/sites/default/files/balint_014_xml45.pdf This was before the Trump v Anderson 23-719 ruling March 4 2024. However the problem is many representation in Congress are not Lawyers, and those that are cannot strategically think. That same resolution by changing the name to Trump and referencing the language of Trump v Anderson 23-719 identifying the conduct and it it is in rebellion to the Constitution of the United States and Congressional laws could trigger a mandatory Section 3 "Amnesty vote". The Supreme Court said this can be done at "any time" as Congress has enforcement jurisdiction. Upon failing the vote the party must vacate their office.
Failure to do so can bring a court order and Marshals to physically remove them. YouTube pundit creators like Marc Elias and Brian Tyler Cohen are clueless to use of and interpreting the law to make it work. See for example idiocy and fear on display by Elias at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CedQKOm29YE and how Harris actually did win the election, but they all so quickly cowardly accepted Trump and capitulated in the name of "peaceful transfer of power" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3UiB3xwyfPQ
See the movie "Vigilante Inc" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_XdtAQXnGE
Here is a proposed resolution any member of the house may file which will command the "Amnesty Vote" be done - or not and then unless Trump suceeds in a 2/3 majority in both houses, he must vacate office and his entire administration is then defunct also, if not a court may order the US Marshals may remove Trump. Technically Harris would become the President and she may then staff a new administration, or resign and name a new replacement "technically". It should be noted this can be done to any and all members who have violated the constitution and their oaths of office including Speaker Mike Johnson who led the Janauary 6, 2021 effort with a rebelious amicus brief. https://sadpac.com/sites/default/files/resolution_done.pdf
Note from Balint's press release that a privileged resolution can trigger a vote within two days, here however Trump would need a 2/3 vote to clear Section 3 of the 14th amendment issue. See https://balint.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=132
Here are four More Perfect Union videos that summarize what really afoot in America. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZlxOvHwcq0 and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ymPHzIkvug and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWkZhpsnasQ and the real true story behind the "eating pets" scandal of Springfield Ohio at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MI66d8e74nM
Deep Doo Doo says Richard Wolffe the United States is in at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFa4Lm_ZTyI and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEEivjQnUcw and https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8bxfW-jNbf0 and tariffs will only make it worse - all of it - laying a huge burden on American citizens
Quo Warranto for insurrective disqualifying activity is a form of mandamus upon a court to enforce the law and Constitution. What could go wrong??? If drafted and targeted properly not much, but still several things none of which will be mentioned here as it would give ammunition to the opposition. Multiple actions may need to be brought against members of Congress who knew better. Trump remains Constitutionally ineligible to hold office, but not yet disqualified. Trump is now in illegitimate president land and the vote of the final sentence of Section 3 of the 14th amendment is required to disqualify him or not. The Supreme Court said Congress may do this at "any time, even post election.
Biden is on the late show and failed to timely act, and this what age does. The way to deal with Trump at this point is Quo Warranto action constructed around all his Section 3 of the 14th amendment violations. Binkley showed that the law is there, but money is needed for legal counsel to bring the action. Then Trump and all his administration will be flushed away. See https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uEBmJ-aAmBo Biden was late with progressive efforts and it landed us here See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3ucVOlTDZI and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UyhTlXS2Sqo
Here are three videos from UNFTR (UN F#$k The Republic) which is elitist and slow moving but largely correct. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xV3_deK-E4 and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oJh_NOCZoY and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLnKmlYVdpE
Trump thinks he is smart, but size of his small head hidden by his comb over says otherwise as China SHUTS DOWN $164 Billion U.S. Farming Industry... What’s Next? - at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNbzREXDIwc Here is another example from Lawrence O'Donnell at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5GWT8zk2Hk and Alex Wagner with Jasmine Crockett at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFw7FapvwDE and another by Ari Melber at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRVXKcTwDCE
But Trump is just plain STUPID. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hBf0N8SU43Y
This is how STUPID Mr Trump really is as he has the entire world now dumping on American bonds. Trump will put America into recession. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlAMJCw0C5Y and Canada already has fired a serious Salvo as to trade. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPeRNQfw9YU and Trump is not fooling anyone with his Russian consigliatory Administration. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zn9BTALjtLY as Trump clearly does not realize how delicate and sensitive financial markets are.
Lawrence O'Donnell is right that a STUPID person cannot ever know they are stupid, it takes an intelligent person to know they just did something stupid, and a more intelligent person to know not to do something stupid in the first place. See also Rachel Maddow at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvPEysxCwfg
Certify an idiot Constitutionally ineligible candidate and see how fast he can tank his idiot self???
Can a Constitutionally ineligible candidate win an election?? No, the votes are invalid until the ineligible candidate is cleared of that status. More important is that no one has ever addressed the Trump v Anderson 23-719 ruling March 4 2024 at page 8 referring to footnote 2 reflects how that is handled and how Trump remains Constitutionally ineligible to hold office again currently. See YouTube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AeIOuEawNC4 Hard to respect kangaroo legal thinking.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQju589ggMA
Warren just needed to raise a point of order January 6, 2025 to force the Section 3 of the 14th amendment vote
Trump is Constitutionally ineligible to hold office
On January 5, 2025 Jessica Denson posted the evidence the election was tampered with. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkmSXcHLjLE That is proof enough but the reality is that Trump is and remains constitutionally ineligible to hold office ever again unless Congress relieves the disability. The Supreme Court has made clear the bar to office attached on Trump by his conduct. No amnesty vote was taken by the final sentence of Section 3 of the 14th amendment. Now the proof is relevant irrelevant because the legal path is now Quo Warranto which is actually plead as Mandamus for a Federal Court granted jurisdiction such as DC District federal court under DC Code 16-3501. The end result is an order forcing the amnesty vote required by the Constitution at the final sentence of Section 3 of the 14th amendment.. Thus the election anomalies are irrelevant against a Constitutionally ineligible candidate
On the eve of the electoral count, January 5, 2025 this video with David Cay Johnston explains to Anthony Davis on his "Weekend Show", why the Democrats are so spineless to enforce the law and Constitution all they can. The truth is only one thing can recall Congress to force the Section 3 of the 14th amendment issue vote is a Quo Warranto action after Trump is installed as a Constitutionally ineligible president. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgOsa-0tRRo
There are a couple of videos properly addressing the Section 3 of the 14th amendment issue at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76s9QCDVub8 and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C30stwTsuyI and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AeIOuEawNC4
The day after January 6, 2025 when the Nation was sold out by the Democrats at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ScgtAVdUTyY
Here is the root of the problem and there appears is no fix but to finish the National Popular Vote Effort. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hc8wsrwLmgE and begin enforcement of the Constitution as to "justice, domestic tranquility and to form a more perfect union". That is a real dream.
Trump's idiot thinking and word use about subsidizing Canada. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cw0R0EOEEyA and how Republicans want to blackmail for relief funds for California wildfires from Mike Johnson at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29eB77rVg-g and Maddow points out the clown show of the Trump transition at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Au88UrVeoc and Trump threatens John Deere and they say F. U. Trump at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43Pbylomcdc and even Peter Zeihan weighs in about Panama Canal, Canada and Greenland at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6qFo28QiMQ
and finally David Feldman on the Los Angeles wildfires, Trump, Tik Tok and other news January 12, 2025 at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1pmonpNjBk
You should review the legal sidebar of the Congressional Research Service article https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB11096/5 but what it does not address - because it was written in January 2024, is the Trump v Anderson 23-719 ruling of the Supreme Court March 4 2024 at page 8 referring to footnote 2.
The most important thing the Supreme Court said was "Section 3 activates on conduct and nothing more". This is a funky way to say, no charge, no court ruling and no indictment is required for the bar to office to activate. That means Trump has made himself Constitutionally ineligible to hold office ever again unless Congress relieves the disability by a compendium of things he has publicly done.
No court, nor charge, nor indictment is required though all of his indictments already have activated Section 3 of the 14th amendment automatically. Because they activate on conduct, even dismissed cases STILL leave the Section 3 bar standing. Even a simple "point of order" in the joint session January 6, 2025 should force the set aside of the votes to Trump until a 2/3 majority vote in both houses is achieved.
Attorneys are so accustomed to a Complaint, a court, a charge, a ruling an indictment that they cannot wrap their heads around self executing law.
Ultimately, the responsibility for enforcing constitutional requirements falls upon Congress in the counting and certifying of electoral votes.
Trump remains a Constitutionally ineligible candidate to hold office and Biden, Garland and Smith screwed the nation. See the objection below which is the embodiment of Constitutional rule of law they are duty bound by the oath to support and defend the Constitution, the objection Democrats should file and stop Trump from having votes counted January 6 2025, See for example https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2qNumxMo2E
Mr Trump appears to have won the election, but time is showing not the National Popular Vote.. Mr Trump is the first candidate ever who did so as a Constitutionally ineligible candidate. A read of the objection shows how the Supreme Court said so in Trump v Anderson 23-719 ruling March 4 2024 at page 8 referring to footnote 2. Thus he is currently not the "President elect". He needs to first clear the Constitutional ineligible status through Congress with a 2/3 vote in both houses.
The American people need to understand their own election law, as all his picks for his "administration" legally mean nothing until he becomes a constitutionality eligible party to have votes counted. Right now the Democrats clearly have no clue what the process is for Trump. The objection on this page is technically in effect currently but the Congress needs to do its job and actually sign onto and file it.
The Republicans have figured out how to chip away from within as domestic terrorism. They plainly violate 18 USC 2383 and 2384 and 1918 and 2331 (5).
Democrats need to wake up and understand the process for Trump as he is currently Constitutionally ineligible to hold office ever again unless Congress relieves the disability.
Congressional Democrats are planning to ignore the Constitution to certify Trump. It is slowly coming out how he manipulated the American psyche with such persistent lies and even fake Harris ads that actually is one huge violation of 18 USC 241. See https://www.politico.com/news/2024/10/31/donald-trump-january-6-electio…
A focus and pressure right now belongs on Congressional Democrats.
Trump's speech and lies was designed to to "injure, oppress, threaten or intimidate" and was not a political campaign and the same can be said about his planned administration. Quite literally "illegal". It is not "free speech to lie and cast dispersion with the intent to cause others to act against their own good or the government. Many voters are discovering that they were duped. See Harry Littman outline much of it here at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msLuxaE5bxU and how Professor Synder points out Trump is trying to build a dysfunctional government with his administration and cabinet picks at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5J9G0ET3mEs
Better yet see Brian Tyler Cohen get opposing views on Trump in his Constitutional ineligible candidate status from Marc Elias who has been wrong time and again including " I am not concerned because January 6, 2025 Hakeem Jeffries will be speaker of the house" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G44RF0Ma09w&t=315s and Glenn Kirchner citing to law and the Constitution the opposite which Cohen tries to word salad political dress away that reality. Cohen who has no law degree nor education spins it politically instead of a short discussion on how that might work. How it might work is the objection attached which both Elias and Kirschner had at the time of the interview. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORiQqcLfpxc&t=110s Kirschner actually read what the Supreme Court said in Trump v Anderson 23-719 ruling March 4 2024 and if Elias did he completely misunderstood what it said.
Waking up the country to direct Congress properly should be the immediate goal.
re: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXzkNKVLy9g
It is incomprehensible to understand why the Biden administration and Congressional Democrats are playing with Trump. He is Constitutionally ineligible and only Congress can relieve that disability. Glenn Kirschner is correct. The Supreme Court said Trump has until the electoral count to clear that disability. Read the Trump v Anderson 23-719 ruling March 4 2024 at page 8 referring to footnote 2 Biden may end up with a scandal at the end of his administration.
The Congressional Democrats talk about welcoming the new "currently ineligible candidate" as a new administration. They are truly scared for their safety, but cannot properly sell the Constitution of the United States out for convenience and comfort. The Democrats talk about duty to the American people, but that is BS, their duty is to the government to support and defend the Constitution which means filing the proper objection they have in draft form
David Cay Johnston explains Trump's Delusional mind and how as his own sister Federal Judge Maryann Barry said that "he's f#$&%?g stupid " ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhUF0inU-JQ&t=2458s ) meaning he has been that way from birth and how tariffs will destroy America and the world economy in the process at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tee97KTNYoQ and how it is already starting in Germany at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-gP2ychcY4 and in America the Canary in the Coal mine is the Postal worker contract a national problem at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5S61H5bztg0
Here Robert Reich goes on and on about Trump's ugly political history at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdstZDCCgAc
So if you watched that last video above, then you know it was 75 examples of why Trump should not return to the Whitehouse. Here Robert Reich goes on about the Guilded Age which Trump wants to return to at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFhEoeA5Yj0
The agricultural sector is in trouble. Low food prices means the expensive agricultural equipment industry is collapsing under Chinese weight of cheap competitors which tariffs will not fix because the Chinese have gone global. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMFxX80raH8 At least 50 % of America is racist and stupid, and for sure 21 to 25% of them are illiterate and are slowly learning all the government assistance they have been getting us ob Trump's chopping block to give to the rich. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbiVRnVumVA Mr Trump is the child who screams "look what I know" without a real solution but to loot the US treasury by tax cuts replaced by tariffs as a tax on American citizens. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LO7vqZK9NXU and what is wrong with the Democrats - they are elitist dim wits while the Republicans steal the country blind. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxrkZLWshzU
Meanwhile, this green energy push is actually worse than repowering to just fuel by on the fly low pressure hydrogen. Existing infrastructure fueled by zero emission fuel. Makes sense. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bs0ZHj76Arc But people confuse skin color with intellect. See https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eWM4oO8CSnA and Elon Musk has found a way he thinks to use the dumbest president in history to to help fund his Mars initiative with tax money and government contracts while Neil Degrasse Tyson points out how dumb it really is. Piers Morgan is the uneducated monkey who does not have a clue why it is lunacy to go to Mars to think you will live there. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_aT9jbxrHY while our best initiative would be floating desalination platforms piping fresh water into and connecting the Nation's fresh water systems. The Japanese have figured out they are surrounded by fuel in the Hydrogen they can endlessly extract from the oceans surrounding them.
The "Japanese hydrogen refueling project" refers to a large-scale initiative in Japan to establish a network of hydrogen fueling stations across the country, aiming to provide fuel for hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (HFCVs) and decarbonize transportation by 2030, with a goal of installing 1,000 hydrogen refueling stations nationwide by that date; this network is often called the "Hydrogen Highway" in Japan. America could do better with on the fly generated low pressure pure hydrogen powered repowering conversions.
Is Xi Jinping right - Democracy does not work??? When you have corrupt un-American people in the government then - NO. An American is defined in the Preamble to the Constitution, and mostly NO Republican is following that or thinking that way today. We are going to go to court to get this fixed, because talk is too cheap to do anything, as too with protests. There are people all over Youtube and elsewhere on the internet talking, and writing about how the sky is falling, and they are right but doing nothing to stop it. DONATE to help get it done.done. Or donate anonymously at https://gofund.me/13069fce
Three step process
1. Finish the National Popular Vote Effort Compact into law, finishing by State Constitution initiatives on the ballot in Florida, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio and, Arizona and maybe Oklahoma and Nevada too.
2. Remove actors by Quo Warranto immediately when they wander
3. Put age limits of 65 on all elected offices and government officers of the courts that is as easy as changing the oath of office that they agree to retire at their 65th birthday in order to receive retirement benefits and that their office will invalidate as to them at that time .
Mr Trump reached as of November 7, 2024 had reached a projected 295 electoral votes however not by wide margins in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania to win by and Georgia had so many bomb threats called in allegedly by Russia that the 100,000 votes spread is at the least interfered with by tampering. GINA Bonanno gives a good overview of the election here at https://www.youtube.com/
Upon the set aside of the Trump votes, 3 USC 15(e)(2) dictates those electoral votes "shall be reduced by the number of electors whom the State has failed to appoint or as to whom the objection was sustained." and the Harris number of electors becomes the winning number required.
Sounds unfair you think?? No because Trump and the Republicans had millions of people purged who if they provisionally voted, or were turned away, or are military or other mail in votes may never had their vote counted. Margins as thin as here that could mean Trump did not win. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfs2kC0xOmU and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVGSaiO4Mf4
Trump's tariff plan won't work like he thinks. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5i3Y14TNqCI
"The individual citizen has no federal constitutional right to vote for electors for the President of the United States unless and until the state legislature chooses a statewide election as the means to implement its power to appoint members of the Electoral College. U.S. Const., Art. II, §1.". This from the opinion of Bush v Gore (2000). Similarly nor do they have the right to vote for an insurrectionist who has campaigned in seditious conspiracy to the Constitution of the United States and Congressional laws, and especially the 14th amendment itself. Those votes are not regularly given because the candidate is Constitutionally ineligible to hold office ever again by his own campaign disqualifying activity. Congress need not accept the votes.
But it appears the Democrats are gutless, feckless weinies, more concerned with a "peaceful transfer of power" than saving the country from a mentally defective, low IQ psychopath. They will all violate their oaths of office to support and defend the Constitution. Soldiers who desert rather than fight to enforce the law and Constitution. See https://www.politico.com/news/2024/10/31/donald-trump-january-6-electio… and remember it will take 145 representatives and 34 Senators to make it stick. There is not vote to certify, it is an objection that would matter.
Abortion is a constitutional right found in the Preamble as to regulate it defies "justice, domestic tranquility and to form a more perfect union". A fetus is not a citizen of until born into and breathing air. In October 2024 Judge McBurney made this clear almost in his ruling in Georgia here and the Georgia Supreme Court reversed in nonsense unconstitutionally here and Attorney Michael Popok of Meidas Touch does his non analytical rant at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oR-3xldmIOw
A good attorney easily makes the argument for how the rulings from both Supreme Courts violate the law legalizing murder through the law. How it violates the Preamble and 18 USC 241 in that the rulings cannot be explained to support "justice, domestic tranquility and to form a more perfect union" because a fetus is NOT a citizen until breathing air.
Vice President Kamala Harris was the candidate for the Presidency. Trump is now and remains constitutionally ineligible to hold office ever again. By Trump's rebellion to the Constitution of the United States and Congressional laws he has by court declaration violated Article II Section I Clause I as Trump's effort to stay in power past 4 years without being re-elected which activates Section 3 of the 14th amendment automatically. In 2020, the process of objecting to electoral votes as a procedure did not have the power to sua sponte object and nor could any Congress member show proof any electoral votes were not regularly given. In the end VP Pence refused and later all objections did not reach the vote threshold to do anything other than later count the votes once the Capitol was cleared. The Democrats and General mood is to defeat Trump at the ballot box. Rachel Maddow points out a very real danger however to that plan at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=of9OP_a6MNg and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejb055qbSao
See the Trump v Anderson 23-719 ruling of March 4, 2024 at the bottom of page 8, referring to footnote 2. The Supreme Court ruling is here however a read of the wiki page and the William and Mary article cited in it at footnote 6, which is found locally here shows the proper manner to prosecute it is already and remains in place through the DC District Federal Court by STILL Quo Warranto with an ex rel action as Chapter 35 of the DC Code provides as enacted by Congress.
Following that, today however regardless exists the ECRA of 2022 which defines how and under what terms an objection can be levied to electoral votes being counted or rejected. Today in 2024 "not regularly given" will include votes for a constitutionally ineligible candidate. The Congressional count is political under the Constitution, not criminal. Now application of the courts declaration on and with a properly worded objection signed by 145 representatives and 34 Senators forecloses Section 3 of the 14th amendment which then bars the candidate from the count of any electoral votes. There is a huge difference between 2020 and now 2024 where Mr Trump nor any of his counsel can see the futility of the election of Trump again and being sworn in. See the full documentary story by PBS FRONTLINE "Democracy on Trial" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y44fyh4ap7k. The Supreme Court does not have power nor jurisdiction over this.
Jack Smith 165 page evidence motion of October 2, 2024
Today at the end of July 2024 Trump has dementia that also disqualifies him. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhUF0inU-JQ and that can be one of the disqualifying activity against the Constitution and his campaign in seditious conspiracy to also serve as a bar to office oddly enough preemptively through the 25th amendment. Trump has no path to return to the Whitehouse and for that reason Rachel Maddow may be correct in her warn.
Here is an organization page that does a Project 2025 analysis https://www.authoritarianplaybook2025.org/ and here is a decent Ben Meicelas analysis of what Trump is now trying to lie his way out of connection to the Project 2025 bomb that just went off politically. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2LaSjYOtCg so it is now a keystone cop campaign and Chip Franklin satire with stinging clips at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRrxCX6cJhA pointing out Seal Team 6 ( or others so authorized ) could now visit Trump courtesy of Biden. Imagine a general call to bring someone into custody who if perished in the operation the "bounty hunter" is guaranteed an immediate pardon with various governor pardon agreements of reciprocity in certain states. Here is Biden in his speech after the immunity ruling https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtc_n4Tqr8k and David Feldman argues there is no one to slip in for Biden in the campaign who can beat Trump, and argues if Biden withdraws, Biden should resign the Presidency so Harris can run as incumbant. We cannot say that is a good idea because the United States has never had a female president let alone a non Caucasian one where the campaign also surrounds the White Christian Nationalists at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGY3exW5DD4
George Conway launched a new PAC raising funds to place billboards and other ads. See https://psychopac.org and this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fq--SRdy_I0 but STILL the government is generally infiltrated with the Trump insurrectionists which is our aim to attack eventually if people support the actual solution to the problem. The DOJ may eventually get with a direct attack on Project 2025 - see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M65XrkO2HsM and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uab2TRgVOls Next the DOJ needs to indicte Heritage Foundation Project 2025 publishing under 18 USC 2383 and 2384 and 1918 and 2331 (5) as to specific chapters and authors therof
Kamala whose father was a Stanford professor which CBS published a review of her record at https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/news/what-to-know-about-kamala-harri… and Meidas Touch did this the next day at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aerM0b-a_TU
There Trump has faced a seven syllable alliteration word phrase "project 2025" that due either his dementia or morons speech disability he cannot pronounce. ( See also for dim wit explanations - A PBS Documentary "The Eugenics Crusade" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmRb-0v5xfI that explains Trump's stupidity dementia aside)
Trump says "25" only
Take note of that here and see also https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhUF0inU-JQ
Jamie Raskin sets it out at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qe4J6bzCLK8 and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0spBi6QFo0c and Alex Wagner and George Conway at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5rPQJw1Xk7E
Glen Kirschner suggests Biden should use the Supreme Court ruling now to save democracy at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asMzqa9_zQ8
Someone just needs to tell Biden to pull his head out his rear or 25th amendment him. No new case is needed to revisit when corrupt justices have been removed - it is legal to review them all now
Biden needs to pivot and use the Supreme Court ruling and arrest the 5 male justices and order them by Quo Warranto summarily dismissed for rebellion to the Constitution of the United States and Congressional laws by Section 3 of the 14th amendment and charge all players including Trump with 18 USC 2384, 2383, 1918 and 2331(5) in that order and order the DOJ to figure it out because as an attorney there is a difference between a coup inside the government and a presidential candidate election campaign.
Starting with Quo Warranto to ( https://sadpac. com/sites/default/files/USCOURTS-med-1_24-cv-00033-0.pdf ) vacating an office would be legal due to the ruling itself. Ruling was in a Federal Court about Sheena Bellows Secretary of State in Main, and the court said, you cannot use in a Federaql Court in Quo Warranto to remove a State Official when especuially you have no claim to the office, while it pointed out that for Federal Officiers it is to be filed in the DC District Federal court according to DC Code 16-3501. That allows the DOJ to file to vacate an office on behalf of the United States or a citizen on behalf of the United States upon some disqualifying activity if the DOJ refuses, and the citizen need not need a claim to the office, just enforcement of the Constitution of a disqualifying activity law. This is the "law" the Supreme coiurt referred toin its March 4, 2024 Trump v Anderson ruling that Congress needs to enact to use Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. It was already in place, and Anderson was simply in the wrong court.court.
Disqualifying activity does not need to be proven by conviction in a court of law it just needs to be in the public record. The person accused must prove it not true. Here is one such example at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2OogJBVoa8
Quo Warranto is a shortcut to imperachment when solid rebellion to the Constituion can be shown by public records as a civil action. Impeachment is a political action. The Appeal to a Quo Warranto removal in such a case is to Congress under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment - no to a higher court. Interestingly a Quo Warranto ruling can occur at the hand of a jury under DC Code 16-3501
Then appoint five new Justices and a new chief and in confirmation direct the new court to revisit ALL rulings of the Robert's court to vacate and re-rule as needed in accord justice, domestic tranquility and to form a more perfect union
That would get Biden the respect as president he now needs. Start rounding up project 2025 people as well as Trump and staffers because the lies of Trump demand he be shut up by incarceration. Remind Trump and make him explain how he is even constitutionally eligible to hold such office given Article II Section I Clause I which activates Section 3 of the 14th amendment.
18 USC 2384 prohibits a seditious campaign Trump is running.
That will re-gain respect for Biden if he just grows a pair
The 2024 election is rife with dangerous scenarios. Trump is certified Constitutionally ineligible candidate as the court - the DC Circuit ruling declares Trump in violation of Article II Section I Clause I as Trump's effort to stay in power past 4 years without being re-elected is a trigger of Section 3 of the 14th amendment and bars him from holding office again, absent relief of the disability by 2/3 vote in both houses to remove this disability. Conversely an objection signed by 145 representatives and 34 Senators which then bars the candidate from the relief of the disability cements the lock. Having come to the realization that the Republicans are now domestic terrorists and they are unbelievably stupid, confuse the Supreme Court ruling he may remain on the ballot is not the same that he may take and hold office. See https://www.cato.org/blog/valid-grounds-objections-electoral-count-refo… and pay attention to the "defining votes regularly given" Section. Only in this case, votes are set aside and not countable of the ticket at all president or vice president. That may result in a need to activate the insurrection act. The flip side danger is an internal coup to remove Trump under the 25th Amendment if Congress does not object and Trump gets sworn in. Then we end up with a president Vance. See Leeja Miller video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5PSQgFLaSI
Visit also https://gov-shout.com/Trump_for_President and the precursor page to this one https://gov-shout.com/Saving_American_Democracy and this now outdated page on Removing Trump from the ballot https://gov-shout.com/Remove_Trump and a catch all else page at https://gov-shout.com/Republicans_are_American_Russians
This is a 2 hour 30 minute MSNBC mash-up timeline of how long the Supreme Court has been corrupt and illegitimate https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ofGJ2gMtWU and how Project 2025 weaves into this ruling mash up of news casts from MeidasTouch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6q6CkqNTHo and the Stephanopolous interview after the debate - is ABC trying to do a hit job? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8LoAsHz-Mc Jessica Denson on Meidas Touch preaches bless her heart but has good historical clips at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0MleTQWY2s Glen Kirchner suggests that Biden use these powers now and he is right at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngIcy66RNBQ&t=360s Fred Wellman talks to Lisa Graves about the overview and how it came to be at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kLK9mWhx With the exception of Glen Kirchner everyone is shell shocked and paralyzed while we have been saying this was going happen and how. Dumb blind faith remained in the Supreme Court until they dropped the bomb. Biden just needs to be shocked awake to act using the ruling now but he is stubborn and a bit stupid in addition to being an old brained thinker. Professor Lawrence Tribe calls for Amending the Constitution at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0owLLdeszQQ Here is a roundtable June 29, 2024 about the Supreme Court term with Neil Katayal, Melissa Murray, and George Conway BEFORE the immunity ruling was released at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cpi8hN76t7k But even justice Barrett does not agree completely and says try Trump now under the fake electors scheme at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TPyujI4m_qI Norm Eisman covers the unconstitutional nature of the ruling at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wPhWlIYOME
Right now the Supreme Court is saying arrest us, jail us and try us, and Biden has the power to do just that. Go to https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10569 then search the document for "quo" which will take you to the beginning of the discussion on use of Quo Warranto to remove officers from office, and through DC Code 16-3501 Congress has authorized the DC District federal court to issue those orders - in fact it is their duty - once a proper "disqualifying activity" is indentified in a Quo Warranto petition berfore the court and what is new is Biden can simply jail the justices, and direct the AG to bring that petition and a criminal complaint using for instance 18 USC 2331(5), 18 USC 1918, 18 USC 2383 and 2384 for starters and hold them without bail until they either resign or are no longer breathing air. Any way you look at it "poor behaviours ejects them from their officers under the Constitution, just more expediately by-passing impeachment.
Then Biden can appont FIVE new justices and a Chief and direct them to go about immediate special session review of all Roberts court rulings against "justice, domestic tranquility and to form a more perfect union" revisting and vacating as precedentitally appropriate to put democracy back on track and then order the arrest of key players in the insurrection efforts and similar charges brought including Donald Trump himself. Trump under actual law can be removed from the ballot and then all will be right again, and then vacate this immunity ruling. Straight forward and actually legal by even todays' axioms but expedited and under his new found powers and dictator impromptu. Barbaric or Just ?? Stopping a coup.
At the core issue is firm law that strips jurisdiction of any Federal Jurist through 28 USC 455. The Supreme Court plowed ahead with two justices without jurisdiction to hear the recent rulings. Be clear it has alreadfy been established a null order is produced in such cases. In 6-3 case rulings, they become 4-3 rulings in a 7 member court, the act of going forward itself is a rebellion to the laws of the United States and the Constituion of the United States. See https://casetext.com/analysis/patent-infringement-verdict-nixed-over-judges-stock-ownership This is "poor behavoir" for all in the decision.
The core measure of the propriety of any court ruling is does it measure up to "justice, domestic tranquility andf to form a more perfect union" for the nation and litigants, and in many if not most of recent Roberts Court rulings is "NO", because they push religion based idiologies at the core.
At minimum, and read on.
The Supreme Court has now flown too close to the Sun with wax wings and the Trump immunity ruling is announced that applies to all Presidents is here as this order expands the power of the President to enforce violations of the law - the Justices can be summarily removed.
After the June 28, 2024 debate people were quick to "bed wet" saying Biden should withdraw. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1eL6RkET60 and in the meantime, the Supreme Court used the cover of Bidens performance to release the ruling on Fischer determining 18 USC 1512 cannot apply. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cP0qvTv8K0 This is what happens when one is greedy on the charging. 18 USC 2383 and 2384 was the proper charge along with 18 USC 2331 (5) and 18 USC 1918 but they wanted to try for 20 years imprisonment instead of the limit of 10 under 2383 Jack Smith and Garland screwed that pooch.
Biden should fire Garland and replace him with Kennedy as he is a real prosecutor and will gain votes to boot
But the next day it looks like Biden wanted people to pay attention and then he came roaring back with all eyes on his campaign now. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNbpReScD and https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OHJoewM3WfU It looks like he wanted to collect Trump lies in one place. Jake Broe tried to pay homage to Biden, but he illustrates the problem. He just wants and thinks this will all end with the defeat of Trump at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ikm4kDl4A4A but Jake is dreaming. America NEVER was a Democracy, it is a Democratic Republic powered by racists, an unfair electoral college, unequal Senatorial representation - Wyoming an California both have two senatorial votes with 581,000 people in Wyoming VS 39 million in California and it is a wonder this kind of internal coup has not happened before. The system will never work until changed because it will only take a multiple of people to keep voting addresses in certain states to keep control of the government.government. Joy Reid https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vv_aV-wyohw
David Feldman vigorously debunked the more than 50 lies of Trump in the debate at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RnUhYKnjuic while Dr Bandy Lee, psychoanalyzed Trump's mental illness showing in the debate on the Don Lemon show video as having been the first years ago to sound the alarm about Trump at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsG2w-UASOw as Trump it appears took the bait of a trap for a round of fresh lies others could use while "jacked up Joe" returned with an energized base behind him with a new National message on fire.
People are pretty much loosing their minds over what we warned was coming on the Trump immunity ruling See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQcS6ilr26Y and Micheal Steele shell shocked on camera in disbelief with no clue how to deal with it at https://ww.youtube.com/watch?v=ycdRME47ibY and Melissa Murray calmly explains the Supreme Court coup is complete for now on Don Lemon at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ny5WRYoxOtA and there is a plethora of similar videos.
But the problem and answer is in Biden to use the order against this
The solution is simple. If Biden can still think. Use the power of the order to empty or remove the five men of the Supreme Court for rebellion to the law and the Constitution of the United States as they have become illegitimate by putting their insurrection in writing.
The order is null actually as two of the justices were without jurisdiction by 28 USC 455, but the country has a runaway Republican Supreme Court in declaring a coup and war on government itself violating 18 USC 2331 (5) and 18 USC 1918 rewriting the Constitution by fiat order.
Through the authority to see to law be faithfully executed the Court has written its own Constitution in a series of rulings. Biden needs to demand their resignation upon which refusal either jail them pending trial under 18 USC 2383 and 2384 by and in accord and strip them of their office or upon deadly force authorized if they fail to resign. Good behavior has expired and upon lying to Congress in their confirmation hearings
Then the Congress can call emergency replacement hearings in which in those confirmation appointments direction be given to revisit and vacate and re-rule on the Trump v United States case - this immunity case, Trump v Anderson 23-719, Dobbs, Citizens United, Chevron deference and a host of other cases as ruled on by compromised insurrectionist mindsets rather against the standard of "justice, domestic tranquility and to form a more perfect union" in accord the Preamble of the Constitution.
It would take some smart lawyers and the Congressional Research Service but Biden now has the power right now under and official act to do so above
Biden can order Trump, Johnson, Jordan, Greene and Comer at minimum arrested and jailed under 18 USC 2383 and 2384 for running an insurrectionist and a seditious campaign for president and to overthrow the government as according to the order he now has power to direct the AG to prosecute. While he is at it fire Garland and maybe hire Kennedy as AG to take action.
Once the new Justices are seated and this immunity ruling is vacated things are back to normal
Is Biden awake and smart enough to do so - because this saves America and would gain the respect of
Mr Trump does not understand how social media is working against him with literally thousands of anti-Tump and never Trump people campaigning with the death of a thousand stings in videos. It is unbelievable how anyone could be so stupid and think he is so smart. It is easy to see how his own parents could not stand him and sent him off to a military academy school. Biden walked Trump right into a trap for material Biden can use right up to election day
The real issue is what Jake intimated and said - Democrats will cry about it but not do anything to fix the problem
Biden showed in the State of the Union he is just fine, fiesty and capable. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=al7ont2noYA and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fpBpzBwJsI - fired up ready to go!! - and https://www.youtube.com/
There is a "series" Brian Tyler Cohen runs on YouTube called "Class with Jamie Raskin". Thankfully Raskin is allowed to lecture, and Cohen is largely silent athttps://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLOMpnzRkbFshFspxNgn2SoObbKrkm-_Bb with the April 30 post analyzing the Trump Absolute Immunity claim and Supreme Court argument at htttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9TVMJfimUU
What Raskin is also saying is to entertain Trump's argument is itself a rebellion of the Constitution of the United States because it skips and ignores Article II Section I Clause I which activates Section 3 of the 14th amendment this case is about
The disqualifying activity supercedes any escape from the language of the 14th amendment at electoral Count time under the ECRA of 2022.
It is clear the conservative side of the SCOTUS is in rebellion to the Constitution of the United States at the Preamble at justice, domestic tranquility and to fom a more perfect union in the hearing and in even considering a hypothetical litigant which has standing ever at all.
Just as a police officer may arrest a judge for any offense sadpac com shows , a Quo Warranto action can be brought for rebellion to the Constitution of the United States by Supreme Court Justices upon which by proof disqualifying activity they have already performed in prior orders and lying to Congress about Roe, removes them subject to the final sentence of Section 3 of the 14th amendment
Biden has a one on one interview with Capehart Saturday March 9, 2024 at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03VAGMvmoNQ
On March 4, 2024 the Supreme court ruled Section 3 of the 14th Amendment inaccessible by citizens, They cite through Section 5 that Congress must by legislation and then cite to the Enforcement Act of 1870. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enforcement_Act_of_1870 and which cites to quo warranto. They say the way to do it would be 18 USC 2383. The Supreme Court ruling is here however a read of the wiki page and the William and Mary article cited in it at footnote 6, which is found locally here shows the proper manner to prosecute it is already and remains in place through the DC District Federal Court by STILL Quo Warranto with an ex rel action as Chapter 35 of the DC Code provides as enacted by Congress. (See page 187 and then 192 as ro Federal Officers) Quo Warranto was once a criminal action, and it is now a Civil Action, and that was the change in the Act of 1870. Mr Hinkley as amicus discusses it and that brief is here So the Supreme Court was wrong and in rebellion to the Constitution themselves. The law has always been there - but yes CREW screwed the pooch bringing the Colorado suit wrong - and they were told - but kept going. See and search " quo" in https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10569
The SCOTUS did warn and make clear at page 8...
"" The text of Section 3 reinforces these conclusions. Its fi-
nal sentence empowers Congress to “remove” any Section 3
“disability” by a two-thirds vote of each house. The text im-
poses no limits on that power, and Congress may exercise it
any time, as the respondents concede. See Brief for Re-
spondents 50. In fact, historically, Congress sometimes ex-
ercised this amnesty power postelection to ensure that
some of the people’s chosen candidates could take office.""
Trump and cohorts don't read and comprehend.
However, for the first time in known US recent history the Supreme Court is in open rebellion itself to the Constitution itself - the Constitution is clear the Supreme Court ignores it
The United States no longer has a Supreme Court, it has racist Republicans in robes. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owfVBLSs_Bs as most minorities have surely known for years.
Hear why Attorney Michael Popok of Meidas Touch proves that five of the Justices need to be removed at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLmaem1ojz8 Another union turns against Trump realizing it was a promise of lies. https://ww.youtube.com/watch?v=iukr0Nj_sAs. .
Supreme Court justices can be removed for rebellion against the Constitution of the United States also by Section 3 of the 14th amendment by setting out a petition identifying the disqualifying activity like sadpac com shows and the DC District federal court has the power to do so upon petition to it of a meritorious case like Popok TALKS about
Democrats and Meidas people TALK a lot with no solution offered or asked for and indeed suggestions disappear when offered
Starting in the Preamble, any ruling or order that cannot be identified to support justice, domestic tranquility nor to Form a more perfect union would be unconstitutional as a disqualifying activity. Maybe Popok should do something and stop TALKING into the ether that the sky is falling
People have improperly butted into a females right of justice, domestic tranquility and to form a more perfect union as the Preamble guarantees. A fetus is NOT an American Citizen until a live birth occurs and the cord is cut. Until then a fetus is a parasite of the female that is not guaranteed to be born that she and she alone owns. Like it or not it is no one's business based on their believe or religion to force a woman to carry a child. That is a form of societal rape. Life does not occur at conception that has rights as an American Citizen and that is where stupid thoughts cause stupid results. This is where people become "God Delusional" believing they are religion police. They are not. The proper litigation brought on these principles would force the Supreme Court to honor the Constitution and reverse several rulings, Dobbs especially or be removed from office by quo warranto actions.
Today the Republicans and Racists and Facist have joined forces under the Republicans political tent as White Christian Nationalists " which are white supremacists trying to wrap themselves in the US Constitution as a power" right". They are so so far afield they should be arrested and charged under 18 USC 2383 and 2384. Then fine $1,000, given 10 year suspended sentences on probation, and loose gun, voting, and office holding rights. Harsh??? No, these are the well ons who are still civil war Era insurrectionists in their mindsets. Here are a few well done documentary in your face factoid videos by Attorney Leeja Miller showing how they are wrong. Watch them all. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5camqkr6-8 and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pu5cqoSbeJA and our favorite "How Ronald Reagan ruined everything" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7dHvqA-WB4 then see how it has evolved into the Heritage Foundation project 2025 take over the country effort. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9k3UvaC5m7o and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tty4ituwQcU and here today we find the result is a Republican Supreme Court that is so far afield of the Preamble of the Constitution it demands action to remove the Republican majority from the Court. Here is Marc Elias and Molly Jong Fast March 29, 2024 on how the Nation duped itself into the latest non-lawyer Republican nightmare of Donald John Trump. Take note - and this is important every democratic presidential administration except Carter (VP Mondale was an attorney) has been a lawyer duo while the Republicans have not. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WQpPLqe8b0 even Nixon and Ford was an attorney duo administration who laid the Trump copy cat playbook for Trump. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8dRp2oQL8U and let it be said it has been these non lawyer types in office bringing us some of the worst Presidents in living memory and how and why below is the best way to get rid of the problem. Are we all modern anatomical humans??? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnIQRMgNDRQ
Lawrence O'Donnell shows how three former US Presidents ALL Lawyers on stage raise 25 million in one night March 29, 2024 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpQqAb_NXM4 and Joy Reid on the real migrant contributions to America https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9ZXmCeGSNI and Liz Cheney says we can survive Biden policies but not those of another Trump presidency https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZC7LBmjhmg and a FOX host shows how Trump is failing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5-wXfpMMso and then there is a classic Mehdi Hasan special on Marjorie Taylor Greene https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8SclXlr4yc January 31, 2023. and how lies catch up to Trump in legal flip flopping as per Michael Popok on Meidas Touch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5Bd4L-r9ks March 29, 2024 as everything out of one's mouth is not protected free speech like pro per people typically believe. Trump is pissing off the Judiciary more and more, Royce C Lamberth chasticized rhetoric like what Stefanik promotes and Judge Reggie Walton, both of the DC District court spoke out and those are the judges with Quo Warranto powers over Congress. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCx9cetyiuM and Trump illustrates how he is just plain stupid against the backdrop of COVID with Bob Woodward on Ari Melber's MSNBC Show, The Beat special posted July 11, 2023 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6i7cv_y1Vs
Sadly Jack Smith made a huge mistake because the proper charges were 18 USC 2383 and 2384 in place of 1512 and charge ALL Trump supporters under aid and comfort with minimum $1,000 fines, 10 year suspended sentence on probation with a loss of voting, gun and office holding rights for ten years. People need to be told Religion is NOT a part of American government and that racism and fascism has no place in America. It is NOT free speech. Go after and disband organizations like the Heritage Foundation trying to make it so. Then the courts need to enforce that, including cleaning out the Supreme Court first thing of those who cannot rule or adjust their rulings to comport with that.
Justice Stephen Breyer would catagorize this reading as a "pragmatism approach" and in such an instance decisions like Dobbs, and Trump v Anderson 23-719 would not have resulted in reversals because the Preamble describes the "rule of law" goes through "justice", " domestic tranquility" and forms "a more perfect union". The reason is "liberty and justice for all" as this is why there is a separation of church and state because no matter one's personal beliefs, they have no business in the personal affects of another. If you do not like abortion for your personal reasons or religion, it still is not your business. Life begins when an offspring breaths air. Until that time, many things could go wrong before it takes it's first breath of air. Up to that time modern medicine can intrude into "establish viability" and still be wrong. Viability also has to do with after care and accidents have happened called crib death usually, and all of that is a personal matter, not a legal one even if the woman does want the infant. That still remains in our constitution at the Preamble in domestic tranquility no one's business but the person carrying the fetus. Like it or not it is no one's business but the female carrying the temporary parasite. Stephen Breyer gives an excellent interview with Kristen Welker March 31, 2024 at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZdcEAzh6O0
Here is the ugly reality that racists, fascists, and Un-American people who think skin color defines patriotism currently led by Donald John Trump, and while he will not succeed in returning to the Presidency, he has ballooned and exposed a radical poison lurking in America. It is time for enough and to use 18 USC 2383 and 2384. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24htq0_4klg and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HR6oqdFRvxQ and therefore it is time to stop talking and take action.
An American patriot is defined in the Preamble of the Constitution which dictates thought and proper behavior in society of which no Republican is following. Trump is not a candidate for office because he Is a constitutionally ineligible person in rebellion to the Constitution of the United States and an open racist, facist, dog whistling seditious conspiratist with racist followers he has emboldened and brought out of the wood work. This is how we get back America, which it seems no one wants to do. The longer Trump is allowed to speak and the media covers it to spread it, it is all free to Trump and the worse it will become
Mr Trump is medically "crazy". In the age of Eugenics the phrase "Moron" was coined meaning one of a mental capacity of a 10 to 12 year old with no morals. Even Mary Trump has said Donald has the same brain and thought of the little boy of teen age years. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKJg2DIskC8
Technological ignorance has invaded good sense in the United States. Intruding into lives of others the Republicans mistake for law often rooted in Racism and Religion. The Preamble prohibits much of the Republican party Supreme Court rulings because they are not necessary for the country and instead interfere with the three concepts of "justice", "tranquility" or a "more perfect union" for all.
Jackson v Massachusetts 197 US 11 (1905) sets the standard that even crosses into free speech. It seems the keepers of democracy have become feckless and forgotten the Preamble
Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the authority of states to enforce compulsory vaccination laws. The Court's decision articulated the view that individual liberty is not absolute and is subject to the police power of the state.
Jackson v. Massachusetts - Wikipedia
The Republicans position cannot square any of their positions with "justice", "tranquility" or a "more perfect union" for all. All speech is not free speech as too many wrongfully believe. Until get back to for fully managing what people say the country will decline under the foot of dim wits
This is the cost of racism and being caught at fraud and criminal activity. Voting is not enough because this racist facist republican party needs destruction and enforcement of 18 USC 2383 and 2384 for all Trump supporters for aid and comfort $1,000 fine, 10 year suspended sentence on probation and loss of gun, voting and office rights. Religion has no place in government, nor consideration therein and this needs to be made clear and rebellion to the Constitution of the United States must be quelled and addressed.
The ECRA of 2022 now allows for rejection of votes as not regularly given for a constitutionally ineligible candidate which Trump is citing through Section 3 of the 14th amendment even though the Supreme Court in it March 4, 2024 order says states or citizens cannot use the Section without instructive law from Congress, but because it only bars the States from disqualifying from the ballot a federal candidate, but it does not speak to nor prohibit Congress from the definitional constitutionally ineligible candidate status from automatically attaching due disqualifying activity of the candidate.
The Supreme Court had no jurisdiction to relieve Trump's disability, only Congress does. In fact the SCOTUS had no jurisdiction to hear the case - only Congress did. . In such a case electors votes from certain states could be rejected and the loosing candidate is elevated to claim those electoral votes.. This could result in an objection signed by 145 representatives and 34 Senators which then bars the candidate from removal of the disability for not being able to reach the 2/3 majority required to remove the disability. See for example https://www.cato.org/blog/electoral-count-act-presidential-ineligibility But this so called new law to Section 3 of the 14th amendment is already in place in the DC District court as enacted by Congress as previously stated. We will use it to remove government officers
Sherrilyn Ifill of Harvard went on Alex Wagner March 7, 2024 and declared doom and gloom that Section 3 had been emasculated by the order. She is wrong and that is what the Supreme Court wants people to believe to chill them. Section 3 of the 14th amendment remains accessible through Quo Warranto against Federal Officers through the DC Federal District Court as set and passed by Congress. It is exactly what the Supreme Court says was done - but they think is repealed from the Enforcement Act of 1870. It is not, it is simply decriminalized. As much as Ms. Ifill speaks to how the Supreme Court was unprepared, why would anyone believe what the order says??. It may be harder to convince a Judge now, which was the goal - but even the Supreme Court cannot nullify a constitutional provision. See her interview at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CK7PK305zwU
Here is the problem https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_OB8ggfznA and why not to believe polls and part of the solution at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SqAacCXy9E but voting alone is not enough, a vehicle to remove people from office, known as Quo Warranto is needed. That costs money and sophisticated organization.
We are going to go after making American Democracy work in court. A Judge could want to do the right thing, but they cannot move and act on their own unless a case is filed before them. To get the insurrectionists out of government costs money for hiring a Law firm. The vehicle to do it is there called "Quo Warranto" - it was put into the law by Congress for just this purpose. A new HYBRID PAC (Political Action Committee) SADPAC organization to be registered with the FEC (Federal Election Commission) is a vehicle to get this done. We are soliciting donations because it will take A LOT of money to do this. A HYBRID PAC can solicit unlimited anonymous donations so long as no candidate is involved to support. A PAC is required to report to the FEC how the money is spent. There is a DRAFT petition ready, and it would be filed, but a Judge will need to accept it. Quo Warranto is a "on relation" action brought in the name of the people, also called an "ex rel" action. The jurisdiction for Quo Warranto, which is used through Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, as to government persons is found at https://code.dccouncil.gov/us/dc/council/code/titles/16/chapters/35 It has to be served on the DOJ first for them to turn down pursuit of. It has been for all of the Biden administration the DOJ has done nothing, and a version of the suit served on them 4 times so far toi crickets. So if you want something done about Congress - DONATE
The Trump v Anderson 23-719 Colorado Removal of Trump from the Ballot case is found here at the public docket at https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/ht... documents filed will launch from there. . That is a case of CREW screwing up the effort - despite being told they were doing it wrong.
Here is the best amicus brief alleged to be in support of neither party. It claims the DC Federal Court has exclusive jurisdiction to issue Quo Warranto to include the president, and this is true BUT guess how Quo Warranto is proved??? By the use of Section 3 of the 14th amendment as against rebellion against the Constitution of the United States such as a violation of a specific Article, Section and Clause or Amendment and Section and or Clause in rebellion thereto by the conduct of the person alleged to be in violation of an ability to hold office. The brief tries to show the automatic disqualification does not apply to keep the person from running in the first place. Quo Warranto is used to remove someone from office through Section 3 of the 14th amendment and this amicus author is plain confused or is attempting to mislead the court. That brief is here
Yes the is a big problem with the Supreme Court, yes Quo Wrranto can be used on the Justices also with very specific proof how they have rebelled as to the Constitution. It will a District Judge with real hutzpah to take on that one. The Petition if air tight requires they sign onto the case or convene a multi-judge court.
American Democracy has major design problems that lend well to insurrections inside government. Section 3 of the 14th amendment is self executing and still - and always will be in play. The Supreme Court does not have power nor jurisdiction over it or to change it. Trump is disqualified and we shall see how courts being cowardly stick their heads in the sand to avoid it. See https://gov-shout.com/Remove_Trump and https://gov-shout.com/Republicans_are_American_Russians
Jamie Raskin shares his view on the American Demoicracy as a crisis in early March 2024 at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12X2eCbTiRU
Talk is cheap and worthless so action is needed and where it starts is in the Preamble
Republicans in every way violate that in their ideas and theology to butt in and control people's lives
Laws as to the person are unconstitutional while laws governing conduct of the person in society are not
Law against colored people drinking from a public fountain is as to the person. No urinating in a public fountain is against the person for the good of and to protect society
Raskin is wrong about Trump in his second impeachment. There was no trial because Robert's did not preside He should know better see Article I Section 3 Clause 6 of the Constitution
Insurrection is not the issue, rebellion to the Constitution of the United States to Article II Section I Clause I which activates Section 3 of the 14th amendment is self executing and the issue with Trump and all supporting him.
An American is defined in the Preamble of the United States Constitution . If you cannot think and behave that way, you are not an "American", you are "un-American. It is that simple, but more so if you have taken an oath to the Constitution in any position or office under law, you can be prosecuted, sued, and removed from your position by Quo Warranto. No it is done often enough so here we are.
The preamble sets the stage for the Constitution (Archives.gov). It clearly communicates the intentions of the framers and the purpose of the document. The preamble is an introduction to the highest law of the land; it is not the law. It does not define government powers or individual rights.
Establish Justice is the first of five objectives outlined in the 52-word paragraph that the Framers drafted in six weeks during the hot Philadelphia summer of 1787. They found a way to agree on the following basic principles:
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Thus," laws against the person" are unconstitutional whereas laws as to society are not. For instance one cannot general walk about unclothed showing genitalia, in public, whereas in many areas of private gathers it is not unlawful. A "law against the person" is one applicable against an individual be it in public or private, such as the "colored" drinking fountain laws, and later abortion and bodily autonomy restrictive laws. A law cannot apply in abstract on an no-actualized event such as child support for an unborn child and give it a think, how an embryo is a citizen before breathing air born in a certain land. That would mean a non citizen who becomes impregnated in America and returns to South America is giving birth to an American citizen. It becomes apparent absurdity of many of these laws against the person. What about the person who is impregnated in a free abortion state like California who is forcibly taken to a penal abortion state kidnapped outside an abortion clinic waiting for her appointment. This is why the Dobbs decision was unconstitutional as well as plain stupid given its infringement on the person without reasons of harm upon the public society. But because the Preamble is often thought of as not having legal effect, the truth is that the Preamble IS THE ENTIRE Constitution in a nutshell, with articles of operation that follow. Attorneys need to be sent to courts to shame and remind these judges where their power of the people's business begins and ends.
December 19, 2023 the Colorado Supreme barred Trump from the ballot. The 208 page ruling is here Anyone could use this as Judicial Notice in Requests to bar Trump from there ballots OR take it to a Federal Court in Federal election mandamus. In reality the SCOTUS has no jurisdiction here by Section 3 of the 14th Amendment and we will need to see if they honor the final sentence of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment says and cast it to Congress where it belongs by the Constitution itself, so by the US Constitution the Colorado Supreme Court ruling is final
American Democracy is a Republic of Representatives and not a Direct Democracy. To make things worse the Electoral college is absolutely the worst creation of a government. We MUST convert the Electoral college to the National Popular Vote manner of choosing electors and then create a national verified electronic instantaneous polling system to directly direct representatives to listen to the will of their constituents with a IMEI verification polling voting system that uses billing information to direct the issue to the proper representative be it state or federal. And yes such a system is possible and does exist.. Then we need to Amend the Constitution so age limits cap at 65 ( or state by state via state Constitution initiatives on the ballot where allowed by law ) and members of the executive and legislative branches must have law degrees and licenses to practice to hold a seat or office. This will put a more sane caliber of person in Congress and the Whitehouse.
Worse, there really isn't a Democracy - as Bush v Gore [531 U.S. 98 (2000)] here reminds us " The individual citizen has no federal constitutional right to vote for electors for the President of the United States unless and until the state legislature chooses a statewide election as the means to implement its power to appoint members of the electoral college. U. S. Const., Art. II, § 1. This is the source for the statement in McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U. S. 1, 35 (1892), that the state legislature's power to select the manner for appointing electors is plenary; it may, if it so chooses, select the electors itself, which indeed was the manner used by state legislatures in several States for many years after the framing of our Constitution. Id., at 28-33. History has now favored the voter, and in each of the several States the citizens themselves vote for Presidential electors. When the state legislature vests the right to vote for President in its people, the right to vote as the legislature has prescribed is fundamental; and one source of its fundamental nature lies in the equal weight accorded to each vote and the equal dignity owed to each voter. The State, of course, after granting the franchise in the special context of Article II, can take back the power to appoint electors "" See e. g. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Lg3R-TtW0U&t=3120s
The founding fathers saw the day when a Donald John Trump would arrive. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxaE4Bea_18&t=360s
But if voters change the State Constitution to manner of choosing the electors to the National Popular Vote, the State cannot take it away like they could with the legislation path the National Popular Vote Effort Compact uses.
In short ALSO states could change their Constitutions and election laws to prohibit candidates over 61 and who are not Lawyers licensed to practice for federal and even state offices. The people could do this by ballot and thus nationwide where persons cannot get on the ballot, it will end geriatrics in government.
Here is a fast talking female Lawyer that explains what is going on but offers no viable solution. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sgn6ml1OeCk and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pu5cqoSbeJA
With the Colorado ruling November 17, 2023 ( https://gov-shout.com/sites/default/files/11_17_2023_final_order.pdf ) defining Trump engaged in insurrection by incitement for the purpose of interfering with a government function, to follow him and give "aid and comfort" thereto him and his ongoing campaign subjects all who do to Section 3 of the 14th amendment and 18 USC 2383 to be removed from office fined, jailed and barred from office.
That ruling and the charge of incitement by the House of Representatives to insurrection cast the bar to office by 18 USC 2383, - that Trump was NOT acquitted for because no constitutional trial occurred because the Chief Justice did not preside. Because both Section 3 of the 14th amendment and 18 USC 2383 by command of the language are self executing as to the bar to office, Trump would have needed 67 not guilty votes in the Senate and then 290 in the house to clear the automatic bar to office by charging with "incitement to insurrection" by the house articles.
See "The Sweep and Force of Section Three" ( https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4532751) and Congressional Research Service - https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/LSB/LSB10569/2 -
The Insurrection Bar to Office: Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment - under "Implimentation" - "A private injured party could also ask a judge to issue a writ of quo warranto to prevent the seating of, or oust from office, an individual who allegedly engaged in disqualifying actactivities According to the final sentence of Section 3 of the 14th amendment only Congress may review the finding and grant relief of the "disability" or or construe the ruling based on "engaged in insurrection". Of course right now that has been ignored for the norm of up the courts.
There is also a group of states in the Northwest which are anti-ethnic anybody. In short where the militias and racists and White Christian Nationalists populate and will run anyone else out. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4o8yR-d6PY They are the insurrectionists by and large.
So what is wrong with the Republicans?? Well sadly they are best described as indoctrinated delusional. Everything about the Republicans of today is about beliefs, many call conspiracy theories and faith. It is all really best described here in a film called "The God Delusion" which is a factual documentary at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzZh2wstj88 Nothing wrong with religion to teach morals, but mystery has no place in a government. Yet the gullible and dim witted flock together around someone who claims to be divine fighting a holy war. Mr Trump is trying to take on this air and some blindly follow him even to their demise and death even. Belief without fact is poison to the brain. If you are going to be "God Delusional" at least go to the likely true beginning according to ancient texts actually found on earth and geological proofs to accompany. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsU_0Mfa5tM
Judge J. Michael Luttig in interview with PBS Frontline (2 hours 43 minutes describes the "failed leadership" to run to the courts for everything and the Independent Legislature Theory. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9YrPe2Vr84&t=2040s June 2022
The Mueller, Trump Showdown FRONTLINE at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsdbCjlZ5cQ - the Cirus lands in Washington DC - at least Nixon - but also a Lawyer - knew when to quit!!! Trump a non lawyer launches a triple down pack of pro se lies. Was this the moment rational Americans had seen enough???
Austrailia's 60 Minutes interviews Mary Trump July 2020 about her book on the family https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guoiy0bZbT8
Here Ari Melber interviews the Author of "Sapiens" explaining the fiction of Religion so many people loose themselves in and therefore become A cult God delusional person. The link to the book is below. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nlni04mpDdg
Here is Palki Sharma the Internet-based Indian news anchor who covers much of everything in the world. On American religion and the 2024 election. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5KOQSJCmG0&t=1926s
This how crazy it is on Thanksgiving 2023 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQLDqyD6Ers
December 8, 2023 Joy Reid on authoritarianism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOsJxpChhMY
Governor Newsom goes over all the issues of how the Republicans are backwards dim wits. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRmoiKvKcc8
Attorney Marc Elias and Attorney Texas Congressional House Representative Jasmine Crockett on Saving Democracy and the Mike Johnson threat. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1H7tHu9TZUs&t=1295s
Isreal has a liar Trump like problem December 13, 2023 - Netanyahu has caused all of the Gaza - Isreal war. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xAfa_5zQKck Biden needs to halt Isreal support.
Here is the thing -it is unlawful as well as unethical to lie in political campaigns and in office.
It is a Federal Law our elected officials must take the Oath of Office. 5 U.S. Code § 3331 - Oath of office
The problem is there is nobody enforcing this Federal Law. Now if You or I lie to a federal agent 18 U.S.C. § 1001, you are facing five or eight years in federal prison, depending on specific facts of the offense The only way to enforce it against members of Congress is by Quo warranto actions.
Lies are not free speech when they cause actions by others that break the law. In general that is "public fraud" and it is actionable as fraud in a court of law as Trump is discovering in his New York state business fraud conviction.. Being a liar creates a teetering existence on disaster as George Santos discovered.
The US Supreme Court took up the issue of the" Stolen Valor Act" eventually gutting it. See https://www.npr.org/2012/02/22/147257716/is-a-lie-just-free-speech-or-is... and https://www.thefire.org/news/why-most-lies-are-protected-speech-and-why-...
But it remains unlawful for government officials and those seeking office to lie. See a law review article on the subject at https://repository.law.uic.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1069&context=... and https://www.freedomforum.org/is-lying-protected-first-amendment/
The short answer is lies that cause others to act unlawfully or to their harm or detriment or unlawfully to your benefit are not protected by the 1st Amendment.
But recently the Colorado ruling states that free speech does not protect the speaker who influences or incites. Trump in his lies on January 6th.
Here is the truth - right now in late 2023 there is a chance to use Quo Warranto to Judicially remove the insurrectionists who are inside the government that follow the insurrectionist Trump. Those who rebelled against the Constitution of the United States.. They can be removed from the office they hold for giving aid and comfort thereto in violation of the 14th amendment at Section 3 by use of Quo Warranto.
To fix them:
FIRST get the National Popular Vote Effort Compact working and prohibit any state from passing laws to restrict voting rights and times or mail in voting. Brian Tyler Cohen and Marc Elias discuss here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSOXJGs9ROk BUT they miss the Meat.
There is another path to activating the National Popular vote compact into law is by state Constitution initiatives on the ballot which could happen in 2024 by bringing the initiative in Arizona, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio and Florida. This bypasses the Legislators of those states and they have enough electoral votes to push it over the line.. There are more states that can be leveraged.
Ask us how to get involved in those states if you live there
There is a relationship between National Popular Vote Effort Compact and Section 3 of the 14th amendment.
It is inconceivable why everyone is - the media - in a panic about Trump's run when he is absolutely Constitutionally barred from office. It begins in Congress with the second impeachment CHARGE which requires a 2/3 Not Guilty vote to remove the automatic bar to office attached the charge through Section 3 of the 14th amendment not requiring any conviction. And the Supreme Court does not have jurisdiction to remove the automatic bar. How can Trump even be sworn in or have votes cast for him?? That is what needs to be addressed. Is the US Constitution toilet tissue??
Every court case brought so far has been wrong and argued wrong , for the reasons Judge J Micheal Luttig sets forth, but the scheme to thwart Article II Section I Clause I in Trump's scheme is now set in public record concrete by co- conspirators who plead guilty and testified in the plea deals to facts of the scheme - leaked videos but valid - that prove the "government function was an engaged in insurrection against the Constitution of the United States " by Trump
In this video below Lawrence Tribe is interviewed a few days after the Colorado filing. This is posted on October 30, 2023 the day the Colorado suit hearing / trial being held and he explains why Section 3 of the 14th amendment is self executing in that it was written at a time when the Judiciary and other branches were not trusted as being staffed with confederate and insurrectionist people. That is why the Congress retains jurisdiction over the matter in the final sentence.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5E_3uhVy08&t=2925s
People need to stop speaking like Trump is already re-elected and crying the sky is falling
What we need to do is get State Constitutional amendment ballot initiatives on the ballot in as a minimum Arizona, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio and Florida to change the manner of casting elector votes to National Popular Vote. It would not hurt to get them on the ballot in ALL states that allow Constitutional amendment initiative efforts like Oklahoma, Nevada and et cetera. Let the people decide in 2024 to activate immediately on election day.
Then also ask states already in the National Popular Vote Effort Compact to amend their manner of choosing electors to activate NOW. That will cut off any path to the Whitehouse but through the National Popular Vote IF three states pass it and those in the Compact activate now. If enough states totalling 65 electors pass it - that would activate the National Popular Vote Effort Compact itself. Trump will never win the National Popular Vote.
The people at National Popular Vote Effort Compact do not get that all that is left are Republican interference states for the legislative and Governors route and the electoral college is actually the biggest threat to Democracy because it is easily manipulated today through social media and the like with lies to the gullible. See link below to "Unfair game how Trump won"
It is a good bet Trump will not be on the General Election ballot for 2024. Here's YouTube video Mx_4aDmERWo ( the full hearing) Minnesota Supreme Court
The court was unable to connect what "engaged in insurrection against the Constitution of the United States" meant and denied the petition for mandamus to bar Trump from the ballot without prejudice. ( presumably when petitioners can define the phrase or return with a Trump conviction) No one so far has brought the Section 3 of the 14th amendment argument correctly from a Constitutional perspective identifying the Article abd Section and Clause Trump rebellion was against. Now proper Federal Mandamus suits can be filed which courts cannot dismiss and ignore AFTER Election officials refuse to bar Trump from the ballot.
Michigan followed suit citing Minnesota. So many people and mostly lawyers at that get it wrong and not want to get up under the Constitution. Well there is now a second bite at the apple.
Two days later Judge J Michael Luttig defined it as falling under Article II Section I Clause I in Trump's scheme to stay in power past 4 years without being re-elected - again see YouTube video Ll4DFbHrOmA&t=132s
Trump's "presidential immunity" claim is thus actually a bar to holding office automatically by Section 3 of the 14th amendment. The impeachment charge of "incitement to insurrection" only pairs to 18 USC 2383 (high crimes and misdemeanors) and defines acts required to convict, BUT carries an automatic self executing bar to office by Trump having "engaged in insurrection against the Constitution of the United States" at and of Article II Section I Clause I by launching his supporters to the Joint Session of Congress to attempt to disrupt and stop the official government function of certifying the electoral votes. Judge Luttig explained this in both interviews he calls "the totality" of the scheme of Trump.
There was no impeachment trial with acquittal in the Senate under Article I Section III because the Chief Justice did NOT preside but REGARDLESS more importantly to CLEAR the bar to office which self executes on the impeachment charge of "incitement to insurrection" of Section 3 of the 14th amendment that had self executed against Trump in the charge by the House of Representatives, and requires no conviction, thus , he would have needed a 2/3 to vote "not guilty" or 67 Senators but he only reached 43. He then would have needed 290 not guilty votes in the House of Representatives to clear and allow him to run for office again, and this is the plain reading of Section 3 of the 14th amendment jurisdictional FINAL SENTENCE.
People see the Senate trial backwards to the Constitution and theJanuary 6, 2021 riot is not the insurrection Section 3 of the 14th amendment is speaking to or requiring for activation.
It is not just about a so called acquittal, it is about clearing the bar of a super majority to remove the bar to office of the charge of incitement to insurrection - against the Constitution of the United States of Article II Section I Clause I. Trump did not. Trump thus remains a barred from office insurrectionist and those who follow and give "aid and comfort" likewise who should be removed from office by Quo warranto actions. The DOJ needs to "clean house".
The Constitution is silent on who presides over what type of proceeding or action for the vote to clear the "disability" of the automatic bar to office, or how the vote is done but a 2/3 not guilty vote would satisfy Section 3 of the 14th amendment in a trial of any sort presided by whomever in the US Senate and Trump did not reach that. Trump thus remains GUILTY of "engaged in insurrection against the Constitution of the United States" in accord his attempts to thwart Article II Section I Clause I which is in Trump's case is the "engaged in insurrection" Section 3 of the 14th amendment requires.
This is what the Minnesota Supreme Court could not wrap their heads around and the attorneys arguing the case fell short also. Sometimes precedent just clouds things. Trump's entire presidential campaign is a continuation of the insurrection, and he says so. It is a continuing conspiracy to defraud and destroy the United States as we know it. There is clear law to shut him down and his followers and it is time to use it immediately.
Trump plans to cheat and manipulate the electoral college as he did in 2016. See "Unfair game how Trump won". Jump to relevant portion of See YouTube video UJScbYEyapQ&t=2580s and to view entire documentary remove the "&t=2580s" from the end of the url or slide the lower video time bar to the beginning. The electoral college is the biggest threat to American Democracy in it is easily manipulated to voters today with social media and personal habit tracking. Trump is thumbing his nose right at the court because it only takes ONE juror to derail the entire thing.
Hopefully this will be worked into hearing argument under dkt doc 139 of this Case 1:23-cr-00257-TSC to the Court so the court can see the pari-mutual connection of this case and 18 USC 2383 and Section 3 of the 14th amendment.
Judge Luttig here explains why 18 USC 2383 was not and should not have been charged to Trump by Jack Smith See YouTube video ecjvi8XtM00&t=426s
All the court need do is work Trump's conspiracy against the United States to Article II Section I Clause I as Trump's being "engaged in insurrection against the Constitution of the United States" thus being in the record and when Trump appeals it interlocutorily the appellate court can pour concrete on him and his campaign for re-election
SECOND get up under Section 3 of the 14th amendment and use Quo Warranto to Judicially remove the insurrectionists who are inside the government. A video on Florida law perspective. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuWeukMCqY0. It works in DC Federal Court for Congressional members. The successful Griffin Quo Warranto complaint is here. The reason this is not being done is because Matt Graves the DC US Attorney who must bring the cases to remove in quo warranto is scared. He has been asked to formally having been served draft complaints to use. See https://www.politico.com/news/2023/10/20/jan-6-prosecutor-pervasive-thre...
THIRD use a verified National polling vote system to send government officials and Congress the preference of their constituents in real time verified one person one vote directives. This is something we are working on using cell phone service and billing address to get the poll to the right official.
FOURTH the US Constitution must be amended to
1. Require all legislative and executive officers of the United States to have Law Degrees and active licenses to practice law. This will improve the caliber of Congressional and Presidential persons. Currently in the 118 Congress, There are currently 61 US Senators with a law degree. 31 of these are Republicans. In the House of Representatives, there are 169 members with law degrees and 78 are Republicans. However the most vocal in charge do not. McCarthy and Greene, and Boebert barely has a GED. At the very least have been a COMMISSIONED Officer in the military.
2. Mandatory retirement age of 65 for all branch members including the Courts. Both Biden and Trump are too old. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJ-kVJfGGyM&t=1836s
3. Move to a National Popular Vote system for general elections. Require states to send electors that select the candidate who won the national popular vote
5 Require a mental competency and and oath of office to the Constitution BEFORE the candidate runs, which will stop seditious speech as part of campaigning.
6. It shall be unlawful for any person, citizen, candidate or official to to communicate an untruth of any king in the furtherance of any goal and if said goal is for any political position, as set forth in Section 3 of the 14th amendment, said act shall activate the bar to office of said 14th amendment.
FIFTH. Something must be done about the United Nations - especially if the United States is going to host it on its land. Re-charter it as the "Unified Nations" and eject China and Russia and bar all non democratic autocratic and dictatorial government s. Encourage a bar to business with them.
Get books for detailed information - the audio version is a good deal if you get out before the trial period ends, and you can cross device record the book
. 
SO... FIRST the National Popular Vote Effort Compact must be actualized. It will take Constitutional Amendment initiative ballots in Arizona, Ohio, Michigan, Ohio, Missouri and Florida to get it done. There are enough Democrat voters in those states to get it done. Someone in those states need to step up and file for petition to get it on the 2024 general election ballot. This when enacted automatically when enough states hit the 270 Electoral Votes states enacting this will end elections being stolen by the electoral college because the National Popular Vote will decide in the 270 states by counting all votes across the nation to award their electors.
Here is Tara Setmayer and Rick Wilson of the Lincoln Project. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b05CRVhNHr0. Here is a few compilation of Republicans and Trump idiot speak. You just cannot find Democrats who publicize their idiocy like this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQfGSXGiJs0 and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fX2ik-pl5eY and Jamie Raskin speaks on how the Republicans have no clue. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tuCKUVSFuqs
Adam Kinzinger sets out how bad it really is. The leader of the insurrection in Congress is now the speaker of the House of Representatives. His insurrection acts are enough to remove him by Quo warranto. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37mnCQrQmYo and he points out the Christian National movement drives the Republicans today and that Democrats become better educated while Republicans are lesser educated. Religion will do that to you when you do not believe in Science. See his book "Renegade"
Trump 2023 Veterans Day Speech, Hitler, Mossilini and "vermin" - Meidas touch - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYisaVSAgnU and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UPB5Jd7uToY
The Trump is a buffoon collage video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18Mf4qZ6tMM
The 2024 Presidential election could be the first to be decided by the National Popular Vote IF initiatives in Florida, Missouri and Ohio passes, and Michigan finishes their legisaltive process. It could be an interesting election night.
See Robert Reich explain why a National Popular Vote is needed to replace the by state winner take all Electoral College Selection at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pn8rWMVGlfQ
For anyone interested in launching this as a Missouri voting citizen start here at https://ballotpedia.org/Laws_governing_the_initiative_process_in_Missour...
The suggested text for the amendment is as follows:
For Ohio go to https://ballotpedia.org/Laws_governing_the_initiative_process_in_Ohio#Ap... In Ohio a Constitutional amendment for abortion rights will be on the ballot in 2024.. See 12:50 into https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1bx5cxBl2w
For Florida go to https://ballotpedia.org/Laws_governing_the_initiative_process_in_Florida... and in Florida for the PAC registration part this organization may be able to help at https://bffcompliance.com/
Thus this is seeking to launch a parallel to the Floridians Protecting Freedom constitutional amendment effort but for the National Popular Vote. Currently a sponsor who is a registered Florida voter is needed. See for example https://initiativepetitions.elections.myflorida.com/InitiativeForms/Volunteer/DSDE155A_999_2307_EN.PDF One is needed for Ohio and Missouri also.
It is unknown how familiar you are with the https://nationalpopularvote.com effort to create a state Compact to use the National Popular Vote (NPV) in the stead of winner take all at a state level. This effort is within 50 electoral votes of activating once Michigan signs theirs into law.
This will be a tough go, but it is looking to be a two pronged amendment, First to eliminate the 60% super majority for amendments, and second to to allow a Voter Choice Ballot to allow the state electors be chosen by the National Popular vote of the Nation. In the 2020 Presidential election the separation was 371, 686 votes and yet the spread was 7 million votes nationwide. 7,059,526 to be exact. There is a point where continuing to count is unfair. Yet the electoral college in some heavy states can sway the outcome ridiculously.
This effort is a compatible hybrid spin to take the question directly to voters. Polls show there are enough non Republicans voters to get this over the line in each of the below states.
In 2023, Florida Representative Michael Gottleib introduced the National Popular Vote bill into the Florida House of Representatives (status of HB53). Senator Victor M. Torres, Jr. introduced the bill in the Senate (status of SB860). They have not progressed.
In Ohio In February 2019, Representatives David Leland, Kristin Boggs, Janine R. Boyd, Catherine D. Ingram, Mary Lightbody, Michael Skindell, and Kristin Boggs introduced the National Popular Vote bill (status of HB70). It is now a dead bill
In Missouri In January 2023, Missouri Representative Ian Mackey introduced the National Popular Vote bill in the Missouri House (status of HB829). Also, Representative Peter Meredith introduced the bill (status of HB997). They have not progressed.
That will leave Florida. Ohio and Missouri needing to be accomplished by constitutional amendment initiative as they are the only remaining states with enough electoral votes to get the compact over the hill to success that allow initiatives.
But those states have a ZERO chance of of getting it through the legislature and the governor signing it as a Republican state. The staffer at National Popular Vote seems a bit in the fog about this math that a legislatively enacted effort is now DOA.
The initiative effort would take the form of a voter choice ballot (VCB) you can see outlined at https://gov-shout.com/Trump_lost_2020_by_5_million_votes#NPV_VCB
The amendment would operate as a quadrannual VCB or a one time NPV change instead of state electors. That would be determined on election day 2024 if enough signatures can be gathered in time
Florida has a super majority component of the initiative process that Florida law is unconstituional given a recent ruling of the US Supreme Court in blocking a constitutional amendment as to the NPV Compact. It appears the 60 percent super majority is lawful any longer given the US Supreme Court ruling in Chiafalo in 2020.
Further the case ruling unanimously on July 6, 2020 out of the US Supreme Court by Justice KAGAN ruled in CHIAFALO ET AL. v. WASHINGTON, locatable on the web as 19-465_i425.pdf specifically alludes to law says a legislature has no power to usurp the villl of the voters and nor does a governor or court. That also means no process can stop the voters and a simple majority is what is valid under US constitution.
Time is of the essence, so we need to move fast to get this moving immediately for the 2024 general election.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| USCOURTS-med-1_24-cv-00033-0.pdf | 248.53 KB |
| balint_014_xml45.pdf | 43.57 KB |